User talk:Got a 69 in my wine

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of The cheapo (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Hello, Got a 69 in my wine! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 22:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lego Group, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lego Group was changed by Got a 69 in my wine (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-01-25T22:23:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Reliableforever. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 22:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bleah!--Got a 69 in my wine (talk) 22:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 22:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks?

You might want to read WP:CIVIL.... ~~SIS~~ 22:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BORING!!!!!! Stay out of it sister, go catch vandals elsewhere you ain't gonna find any here! --Got a 69 in my wine (talk) 22:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Whatever. ~~SIS~~ 22:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Giggity Giggity Goo! --Got a 69 in my wine (talk) 22:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User talk:HexaChord. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord 2 23:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was not making a personal attack I was just expalining your question dude chill out. --Got a 69 in my wine (talk) 23:06, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You attacked an editor who has not been here for a week. You better chill out.--Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 23:50, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you better chill out because nobody cares about that editor --Got a 69 in my wine (talk) 00:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion _(talk) 00:16, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Got a 69 in my wine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm so so so sorry! I did not mean to cause any harm! I will never do it again and I am sincerely sorry

Decline reason:

You were warned to stop multiple times, and responded with more incivility. There's also the issue Acro points out below, which seems to be a reasonable conclusion. Declined. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Probable sock of The cheapo (talk · contribs). First edit was a detailed attack on Reliableforever (talk · contribs), who had contact with The cheapo. Editing patterns are similar. I'm inclined to upgrade to indef. Acroterion _(talk) 00:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Upgraded to indef. The first edit shows that the user is not here to edit an encyclopedia. Review welcome, as always. Acroterion _(talk) 00:43, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]