User talk:Gustave.iii
No reference is given for the data for the maps.
A page you started (Chita distillery) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Chita distillery.
User:Rosguill while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
The article needs more citations to independent, reliable sources. As written, it does not meet notability guidelines, but I was able to find more coverage online that justifies its inclusion in the encyclopedia.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 19:34, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Opinion polling for next UK GE
[edit]The whole issue with it is that you are yourself making your own interpretation of what events shift opinion polling, cherry-picking those events and then presenting all of it into an ad hoc chart that only serves to transmit what you are intending it to transmit. Further, this is de facto bypassing already established consensus at Talk:Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election on which events to add to the table by adding them through a chart. This is entirely out of place as it constitutes a breach of WP:NPOV and WP:OR (specifically, WP:SYNTH). As it has been said, there is no need for this: proof of it is that there is no other such thing in any other Wikipedia article. Impru20talk 21:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited British passport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hijacking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:28, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of Alan MacMasters for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan MacMasters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe (talk) 23:47, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Incidents noticeboard
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:16, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Why hasn't he been blocked yet? Patachonica (talk) 22:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Hemiauchenia, @Patachonica, that section should not have been archived away without action; I have now blocked. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 19:45, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 19:39, 23 July 2022 (UTC)If you want to be unblocked, an actual apology/explanation for the creation and maintenance of the hoax article Alan MacMasters and the associated fake photo is needed. Even if it was created as a "joke" back in 2013, you continued to maintain it up to 2021. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 19:44, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Britishpassport UK4.png listed for discussion
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Britishpassport UK4.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Consulate General of the United Kingdom, Osaka for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consulate General of the United Kingdom, Osaka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.