User talk:Gzhegozh
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Hello. Please stop exaggerating use of Kyiv, and downplay use of Kiev, in English language media. Kiev is still by far more used than Kyiv in media and sources in all natively English-speaking countries, which is what matters when establishing what "common use" in English is (which in turn is what decides what form of the name Wikipedia uses). For what the consensus here on the English language Wikipedia is when it comes to Kiev vs Kyiv please see the endless discussions on Talk:Kiev/naming, including it's archives, a consensus that hasn't changed over the years, and shows no signs of doing so either. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 09:53, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hello Tom. In the recent weeks, many major English and American newspapers have officially reported that they are changing their pronunciation style to Kyiv. If you compare current version of the article with that of the beginning of autumn 2019, you can see in the last sentence of the Name section that number of media sources which use Kiev has declined, with more media preferring Kyiv. This is why the word “many” already doesn’t seem to fit in that sentence, as only one media source, The New York Times, which still uses Kiev, is mentioned there. So I thought that the word “several” would just fit there better. I’d like to kindly ask you to stop accusing me of “exaggerating use of Kyiv", as I never actually changed the pronunciation style in that article or any other articles. Instead, I just wanted to make clear that there has been a recent trend among English-language media of changing the official pronunciation style of Kiev to Kyiv. Also, I am not taking Ukrainian English-language media sources into account. Thanks for your understanding! -- Gzhegozh talk 10:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
[edit]Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)