User talk:Heins9100

August 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:MsFionnuala with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. MsFionnuala _T ^L _C 18:49, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Your pattern of edits today has earned an indefinite suspension of your editing privileges.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

— Scientizzle 19:12, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As you have abused this talk page by using it to attack other editors, I have revoked your ability to edit it. See WP:BASC if you wish to request unblock. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:18, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Abusive email - email facility also revoked. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:51, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hog Cliff

The article Hog Cliff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not entirely sure what the standard of notability is for landforms, but this one hardly seems to meet WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Go Phightins! (talk) 01:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]