User talk:Hits hits
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is Hits hits's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Blocked for 3 months for resumption of edit-warring after last block
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Unblock
[edit]Hits hits (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
- The only reason I was edit warring was because I was trying to prevent content removal. The content removal was removing 1/2 of the compromise making it not a compromise at all. If we had not come to this conclusion I had no way of knowing as users kept on telling me we had reached consensus. user HH (talk) 01:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is not, in any way, an exception to our policy on edit warring. It's especially odd that you chose to continue the reverts while there was an active discussion on ANI. Kuru (talk) 01:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I am leaving as all material is a bunch of made-up lies. Wikipedia is nowhere near where it was when I started editing. Before users obeyed policies. Congratulations to Dcbanners. You have what you wanted. I have left. You have your nonsense numbers. Wikipedia has fallen to your hands. I'll come back when Wikipedia is better. This is really a low point user HH (talk) 18:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Hits hits. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)