User talk:Xeimen129

July 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dave Strader have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dave Strader was changed by IamTheRealStevenWalling (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961046 on 2021-07-22T18:17:20+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:48, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IamTheRealStevenWalling! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:48, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:IamTheRealStevenWalling/sandbox

Hello, IamTheRealStevenWalling. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:IamTheRealStevenWalling/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it appears to impersonate another Wikipedia user. Users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, nor is other disruptive behavior ever allowed. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. For best results, please read the guide to appealing blocks first. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:57, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you're at all interested in making useful contributions to this project please go ahead a request a change of username – right here on this page would be fine. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IamTheRealStevenWalling (talk) 07:35, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unblock-un|user=IAmTheRealStevenWalling|reason=apperantly my username wasant obviusly a joke enough guess i have to change it}} IamNotTheRealStevenWalling (talk) 05:34, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xeimen129 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

apperantly my username wasant obviusly a joke enough guess i have to change it

please change my username IamNotTheRealStevenWalling (talk) 17:15, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're going to have to give a much better explanation than that of what's going on here. Also, we can't pick your new username for you. Follow the instructions above for how to specify it. If the "IamNotTheRealStevenWalling" above is your intended username, that will be declined: Pick a name that represents you. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 20:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{Unblock-un|user=IAmTheRealStevenWalling|reason=Change my username to Xeimen129 please i guess that represents me, and lol i made my name real steven walling becuase of the wikipedia username "tutorial video" as a joke its not that bad, anyways i guess thats all that it is. IamNotTheRealStevenWalling (talk) 13:50, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Xeimen129 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Xeimen129 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

When I was watching that Wikipedia account creation video, I saw Steven Walling and did an ironic obvious inspiration, but that was the joke. change my name to Xeimen129 please That would be cool, that's all its not a pyramid scheme or SSN leaks or anything

Accept reason:

I was really on the fence on this one, but I'm going to give you a chance here. To avoid getting reblocked (and making me look dumb), please:

Take some time to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia norms. Pay attention to the tone our articles are written in. Read Wikipedia:User pages (covers subpages as well). Read Wikipedia:Copyrights. Look at what kinds of edits constructive, experienced editors make.
Avoid anything that could be taken as trolling. Even if you think it's really funny.
Ask at the Teahouse if you have questions about anything. Maybe seek mentorship from a more experienced user.

Happy editing. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 18:45, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you're referencing File:Wikipedia User Name.webm, which is two clicks from Special:CreateAccount, so that plus the specified name actually does answer my objections in my above decline—although I'll ping Steven Walling to see if he feels otherwise. The remaining issue, then, is your contributions to date. Your first edit is borderline vandalism. Your three subsequent edits (excluding to your userpage and usertalk) [1] [2] [3] are all marginal, leaning non-constructive. Can you explain what kinds of edits you will make if unblocked? (Note: Having already declined your request, I can't decline again, but replies here may influence another reviewing admin's decision. Meanwhile, I can accept, if convinced.) -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 20:41, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The joke is pretty funny at first, but it can be confusing to other people and look like it's an account I might have created, so if you could pick a name that doesn't include my name, that would be preferred please. Steven Walling • talk 21:04, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, I meant that the username issue is satisfied contingent on rename. I certainly would not accept this under the current name, and doubt anyone else would either. But I'm a renamer, so I can handle that aspect, if this user is able to give a satisfactory answer to my other concern. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 21:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tamzin, makes sense. Steven Walling • talk 00:49, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My first edit was stupid, I admit. I already knew the pretection were already strict asf. My second edit request was to add a box to the Austria-Hungary article that showed the flag and the naval insignia, both of them. I wanted to do this because people keep spamming the article with edits that change the flag or insignia. My third edit had a permission error, some reason I cant access it, I promise that I won't make any more shit edits. I use Wikipedia unironically a lot I think that adding a box with the flag and insignia to the Austria-Hungary article would be a valuable addition tho. IamNotTheRealStevenWalling (talk) 14:40, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Justlettersandnumbers: I'd tentatively favor a WP:ROPE unblock here after rename, coupled with a strong encouragement to go slow and ask questions at the Teahouse. But it's not a strong feeling, so this isn't the standard "Any objections?" but a more open-ended "What do you think?" -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 17:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and the third thing was your sandbox, a comment you copy-pasted from a YouTube video. In addition to this being useless to us as an encyclopedia, please see Wikipedia:Copyrights—not everything you find on the Internet is free to use, and in fact most things aren't. The reason I'm not too pressed about this is that the edit is from June 2021, submitted to AfC May 2022, and I'm gauging an upward trend in maturity here. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 17:07, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tamzin, no objection from me if you think the user is likely to make useful edits (and is renamed, of course). Thanks for handling this, regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:32, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BadEmpanada

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BadEmpanada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 17:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Youtube channel links in the article got broken when i was trying to put it in, idk why, also why is Keffals allowed but not BadEmpanada IamNotTheRealStevenWalling (talk) 16:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Xeimen129/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Xeimen129/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 16:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Age Of History (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Topic needs to meet WP:Notability guidelines to be included, see WP:NVIDEOGAME for guidance on what to look for, for use in citations to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Age Of History and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:14, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]