User talk:Iamdooser

August 2010

This is the only warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to File:Francisandlights itllbebettercover.jpeg. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. 4twenty42o (talk) 23:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I strike through the rather rude template I/huggle left and apologize for the misunderstanding on my part, I see the rather rude comment you left about bite on my talk. So "my bad man" will have to suffice now.. You may have noticed as well, since you are paying such good attention, that if I made a mistake or screwed up your edit I always fix it. You only need be civil as I have been. - 4twenty42o (talk) 23:36, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't consider it rude, I consider it honest. To de-stress in life, I take what is true and find humor in it. I try to treat things lightly. It is true that you have the Bite article linked from your profile. I find it true that you weren't following its ideals. So, I said it was funny. By being open and honest, I gave you, an experienced member, to entice and encourage me, a newer, inexperienced member. I'm wondering if contributing 'edits' to a discussion page is worthwhile, so that others more knowledgeable can fit it into Wikipedia's formatting rules. That way, I should avoid bites, deconstructive editing, and manage to contribute. What do you think? Iamdooser (talk) 00:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, I'm confused now. It seems you've reverted the file in question back to my edits. So that was a proper edit in the first place? Wha? Iamdooser (talk) 00:06, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think you fully understand how Wikipedia operates perhaps.. I am vandal patrolling...looking for odd edits that stand out. Such as people removing things that shouldn't be removed, blanking pages, adding curse words or down right lies. You got caught in the vandal net by huggle lag. That moment in between one edit and another.

As to the talk pages, I would heartily encourage all users!! new and old to discuss all major changes, problems and ideas on the talk pages. That is after all what we have them for... - 4twenty42o (talk) 00:28, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:43, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of It'll Be Better

The article It'll Be Better has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Untoable album that has been marked as that since 2010

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 19:04, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Striking (album)

The article Striking (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unotable music album

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 19:06, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A Modern Promise

The article A Modern Promise has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unotable album with little info

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 19:06, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Francisandlights itllbebettercover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Francisandlights itllbebettercover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:More Than Music Summer Musicfest

Hello, Iamdooser. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "More Than Music Summer Musicfest".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]