User talk:Indian6630

Your edit to Microsoft Office 2007 and Microsoft Office

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Microsoft Office 2007. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Microsoft Office. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Pethr 16:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

A tag has been placed on Kitchen Play, requesting that it be just faster be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NickelShoe (Talk) 18:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

House

Hello! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Jhinman 11:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:IE 4-5 logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:IE 4-5 logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:SWSAshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SWSAshot.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Windows Vista

I'm not sure why you removed the {{sprotected}} template from the Windows Vista article, but it was inappropriate to do so. Please don't remove this template from any article. Thanks. -/- Warren 18:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Credits.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Credits.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 00:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what this image is supposed to be and why there is a stick figure drawing on it? --BigDT 00:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Segoe UI page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 00:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Credits2.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Credits2.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Credits4.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Credits4.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Outlook_logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Outlook_logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:30, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Windows XP Professional with Korean MUI.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Windows XP Professional with Korean MUI.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Credits5.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Credits5.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Winword 2000.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Winword 2000.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to Windows-related articles

You have made a variety of damaging edits to Windows articles, templates, and images. Here's the deal: Either you stop, now, or you'll find yourself blocked. -/- Warren 03:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Segoe.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Segoe.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On-going vandalism

File:XP important.png

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Paul Cyr 05:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:XP important.png

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} .

—Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 06:41, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit other people's comments on your talk page. It is considered vandalism. If you continue, your block may be extended, and your user talk page protected to prevent further vandalism. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I warned, your block has been extended and your talk page unlocked. You are welcome to come back to Wikipedia and edit constructively when your block expires. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Windows Address Book icon.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Windows Address Book icon.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Word and PowerPoint icon

I'm so sure why you replaced the word and powerpoint icon to 2003. The latest icon is 2007 and should be retained. 219.74.28.41 13:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Windows Media Player icon

I'm not sure why you replaced the windows media player icon to 10. The latest icon is 11 and should be retained.

Blocked

File:XP warning.png

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for vandalizing [[Yamla 19:03, 5 February 2007 (UTC)]]. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.[reply]

Your talk page has been locked again, to prevent you from vandalizing it. The protection will expire when the block does; however, if you resume editing others' comments, you may be blocked again for a longer period. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clock

Tick tock! Tick tock! Hey Josiah, what are you doing?

License tagging for Image:RTWPEshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RTWPEshot.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Notepad XP.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Notepad XP.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

As you have continued your blatant vandalism, you have now been blocked for a month. Please see WP:SOCK and please take this time to consider whether or not you wish to contribute productively to the Wikipedia. --Yamla 18:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:MSAccess 2000.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:MSAccess 2000.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Xpandchicago.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Xpandchicago.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to Features removed in Windows Vista

Please don't add information about Windows 3.1 to this list. Most of these features were removed or altered in earlier versions, not Vista. The article is meant to show changes since WIndows XP. Harryboyles 05:22, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing vandalism: Last warning

You have been previously warned and blocked for your vandalism of user pages and articles related to Microsoft Windows. This is your last warning. If you continue this vandalism, you will be blocked indefinitely. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:XP warning.png

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive behavior. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:40, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Windows Explorer.png)

File:Nuvola apps important blue-virus.svg Thanks for uploading Image:Windows Explorer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:MSAccess 2000.png)

File:Nuvola apps important blue-virus.svg Thanks for uploading Image:MSAccess 2000.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:01, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Winword_2000.png

I have tagged Image:Winword_2000.png as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. MER-C 12:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:WMP7-Icon.png

File:XP important.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WMP7-Icon.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 18:18, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Not blocked user

A tag has been placed on Not blocked user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ViperSnake151 21:26, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sesame Street Closing Sequence

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sesame Street Closing Sequence, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Sesame Street Closing Sequence. Cenarium (talk) 01:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Template:Not orphan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 01:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]