User talk:Indium

Cleared out everything old to Archive 1. Click here to leave a message.

David Kirby

You are right, your edit of the Kirby page was correct, the revert in error. Sorry, but there have been a number of articles, including MMR vaccine where very useful whale.to links (which generally have a trove of salient archived research studies) have been deleted repeatedly by a cadre of editors who can't see past certain editorial comments at the website. Thanks for catching the error. Ombudsman 04:32, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Intro essay

I nearly db-bio'd that page myself.

In fact, it's an overwriting of an existing if pretty ordinary page.

I've reverted it.

I have to go, can you recommend the user for a vandalism block?

Thanks, Ben Aveling 09:05, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Really, I'm going any minute, truely I am.

I believe the overwrite of the intro essay might because it is such a sneaky sort of blanking attack.

I'm happy to wait and see.

Thanks! Ben Aveling 09:49, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Conservative elite

Why do you claim this is a nonsense page?

I don't see a page there. ;) Indium 07:52, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I do not agree with you that communicating is a redundant feature of computers. In fact it is one of the most important features of computers beside information processing. Charlie 09:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Menudo

Just a note to say that I moved the recipe you deleted to Wikibooks:Cookbook:Menudo. It is true that Wikipedia is not a cookbook, as you state in your summary, but please consider moving the recipe to the Wikibooks section, or maybe even the talk page of the article so that others can move the recipe to the Wikibooks section. Thanks Joaquin Murietta 16:01, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PS there is a template you can use next time: {{Move to Wikibooks Cookbook}}

WikiProject AFL

Hi mate, noticed you're a bit of a footy fan. Finally there is something going on on Wikipedia in regards to footy. Check out WikiProject AFL, see you there. Rogerthat 12:35, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm two years late (long time without access to a computer that had my password on it..), and I doubt you remember why you left the message, so I'll leave this one here in case someone else is similarly mistaken: I'm neither a fan of football, nor Australian. Sorry. Indium 17:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Indium. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]