User talk:Internet Projects

User: Internet Projects

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Internet Projects (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 16:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Internet Projects

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Internet Projects (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy but this host or IP is not open proxy.

Decline reason:

No, really. You have to provide your IP address in order for us to investigate your claim. We can't help you unless you do this. Yamla (talk) 18:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: they've replied on their user page. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:27, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If they are able to edit their user page, they are not affected by a block. --Yamla (talk) 19:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Projects, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Internet Projects! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wiki Edition (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Neither of the sources is reliable and, even if they were, the basic details they give are not "significant coverage. There's no indication of Notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wiki Edition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wiki Edition, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 16:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of FrenchPeople (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:30, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blockage indefinitely request

The account has been blocked because of suspicion of sock puppet of the User:FrenchPeople by User:NinjaRobotPirates. I am going to request another account if the problem does not dissolved. My reason is here:

▪The mobile phone was used by another person who is my friend, which he create account under FrenchPeople prior on April 14, 2018. He haven't awareness of using Wikipedia. So he delivered the phone to me, before attempt discarding it. Thus I use it and request for a new account; but I didn't knew.

Recommendation questions: ▪ What should I do when I encounter this situation? ▪ Can I request another account for this time. ▪ Is the blockage extended for long period? What should I do when encourage to unblock it?

Internet Projects (talk) 14:30, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Socker puppet of User:Internet Projects investigation

{{subst:SPI report = I have been blocked due to sock puppet of FrenchPeople and I want to be unlocked. |checkuser=no |sock1= |sock2= |sock3= |ip1= |ip2= |ip3= |evidence=

My mobile phone was used by another person, using Wikipedia to create account "FrenchPeople". He didn't want the phone and he gave me. I created account in another application unlike he used application, Google Chrome while I used Internet application. The only cause of the sock puppet is the difference of mobile application uses. /Diff = 1. See. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:FrenchPeople#/talk/23admincomment= 2. User contributions for FrenchPeople - Wikipedia

!-- Any comment here will go directly into the "Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments" section. DO NOT write anything here unless you are one of those three and know what you are doing. Just leave it blank otherwise. You MUST sign your comment with Internet Projects (talk) 16:15, 3 May 2018 (UTC). This feature is intended for pro forma reports (reports made for the record only, no action is required). WARNING: Writing anything here will cause the case to be marked as CLOSED for the clerks to review and archive. --> }}[reply]

Internet Projects (talk) 16:15, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Internet Projects (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

caught by suspect of sockpuppet of FrenchPeople but I have to choose User:Internet Project as editor than FrenchPeople. I want to "log out" FrenchPeople indefinitely and have use one editor. Thanks Internet Projects (talk) 18:02, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. You, you the person, aren't permitted to edit until your original account is unblocked. You are not eligible for unblock consideration here. Yamla (talk) 19:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to use the template correctly. Copy the text as you see it in the block notice. I can fix it for you this time. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adi Mutluluk (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The show may be notable, but we require multiple, reliable, arm's length sources to provide evidence of it as described above. It is often the case that new editors find the specifics of what we need there tough to understand, you may wish to consider asking for assistance at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Thanks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adi Mutluluk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adi Mutluluk, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe decker ^talk 00:53, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]