User talk:Ireadbooks12

Ireadbooks12, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ireadbooks12! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Primary topic

Hello Ireadbooks12, I would recommend reading WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The "Friends" article being under such a general title is an exception. In almost all cases, a TV show is not going to be the primary topic if we have an article about the more general term. – Thjarkur (talk) 07:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Silent Bay Studios moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Silent Bay Studios, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First edits?

Hi, have you had an account before under another name? In ictu oculi (talk) 18:08, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Silent Bay Studios (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by IceWelder were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft needs to be supported by multiple reliable, secondary sources that contain in-depth coverage. Currently, the draft contains not a single source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Silent Bay Studios and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Silent Bay Studios, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

IceWelder [✉] 18:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aiden Jackson

Hi Ireadbooks12 - I just wanted to let you know that I redirected the article back to the article about the game - there is still very little to say about the character, but if more emerges in due course, and it is supported by reliable sources, it might make sense to create a separate article. Thanks! ninety:one (reply on my talk) 10:06, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dmitry Suchkov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dmitry Suchkov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GermanKity (talk) 07:37, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ugo Ugochukwu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ugo Ugochukwu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WhoAteMyButter (📨_talk│📝^contribs) 18:22, 27 June

Speedy deletion nomination of Dmitry Suchkov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dmitry Suchkov, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 09:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israel, West Virginia. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:11, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Club Penguin, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 11:49, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Cristiano Ronaldo. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 18:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Cristiano Ronaldo. Thank you. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 11:50, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Attica (town), New York. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 15:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alica Schmidt

The article Alica Schmidt has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:16, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Azerbaijan Grand Prix tyre controversy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2021 Azerbaijan Grand Prix tyre controversy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
SSSB (talk) 11:17, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced articles

All Wikipedia articles must be supported by reliable sources- this is a mandatory requirement. Please do not create unreferenced articles, as you have done with Alica Schmidt and 2021 Azerbaijan Grand Prix tyre controversy. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:17, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GTPlanet

Hello Ireadbooks12,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged GTPlanet for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Joseph 2302 (talk) 12:02, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:UNNECLINK

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:UNNECLINK requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

POV version of WP:OVERLINK, which is more factual. This abbreviation is not particularly likely as an alternative of OVERLINK.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 12:20, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shilla (genre) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shilla (genre), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jang Ju-won

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jang Ju-won requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WhoAteMyButter (📨_talk│📝^contribs) 06:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:23, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ireadbooks12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ireadbooks12 (talk) 09:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 09:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ireadbooks12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am aware of everything I did wrong. I promise to edit constructively from now on and look for sources for potentionally controversial information. Ireadbooks12 (talk) 14:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not convince me. Please demonstrate by providing a reliable source for one of the edits you've made so far. It will be very important for you to understand WP:RS. Yamla (talk) 14:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ireadbooks12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Time to prove myself. Note that most of these will be edits I made as an anonymous user.
Kecskemét Air Show revival: https://infostart.hu/belfold/2021/07/03/nyolc-ev-utan-ismet-repulonap-es-haditechnikai-bemutato-kecskemeten
Carlo von Opel founding Intersnack: https://www.rheinpfalz.de/lokal/frankenthal_artikel,-ich-bleibe-ein-kritischer-mensch-interview-mit-chio-chips-gr%C3%BCnder-carlo-von-opel-_arid,5212703.html?reduced=true
Cristiano Ronaldo being named after Ronald Reagan: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2016/01/19/cristiano-ronaldo-was-named-after-ronald-reagan-no-really/
Andrew Farkas being Jewish: https://www.theliteraryreview.org/book-review/authors-andrew-farkas-and-robert-glick-in-conversation/ (to quote: "I was born in Los Angeles to Brooklyn Jews." Ireadbooks12 (talk) 15:11, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've been evading your block and have at least one sock puppet. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: New unblock request.

About my request

@Yamla:, please check my request. Iy took me a long time to write it.

Someone else will review your request. I have already reviewed and declined an unblock request from you. --Yamla (talk) 13:00, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry. Also, is WP:OVERLINK a rule by any chance? I know a page that not only uses it, but also inaccurately ("American market" refers to North America in general, not just the U.S.) --Ireadbooks12 (talk) 13:01, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me?

How is using IPs while blocked count as sock puppeting? --Ireadbooks12 (talk) 05:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocks apply to the person, not just the account. See WP:EVADE. --Yamla (talk) 10:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What about if the person edits constructively on the IP? I'm trying to change. --Ireadbooks12 (talk) 15:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which part of WP:EVADE do you think permits that? Which part of "blocks apply to the person, not just the account" do you think permits that? --Yamla (talk) 17:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So I can't ever edit Wikipedia anymore? I can only read it? --Ireadbooks12 (talk) 17:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Until you are unblocked, that is correct. And your block evasion will count against you in your unblock requests. --Yamla (talk) 17:52, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But my block is permanent, so that means I can't ever edit anymore. Well, I do have a range block for my IPs, so maybe when that expires. --Ireadbooks12 (talk) 18:05, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your block is not permanent, it's indefinite. Note that your explicit threat to continue evading your block will substantially count against your unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 18:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ireadbooks12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As in my above unblock request (that was rejected), where I linked sources to some of my unsourced edits, I can prove that I now understand WP:RS. Ireadbooks12 (talk) 17:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Except again you have been evading your block through IPs. In order for any unblock to be considered, you will need to ceased editing in total around your block through IP. At this point to prove that, I would recommend not editing Wikipedia at all for 6 months, then coming back and requesting an unblock. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:55, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Hidden in Plain Sight (book)

The article Hidden in Plain Sight (book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article by blocked sockpuppet.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:19, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hidden in Plain Sight (book) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hidden in Plain Sight (book) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hidden in Plain Sight (book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kevin McE (talk) 17:09, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ireadbooks, if you ever want to achieve anything here, you'll have to follow the rules. This kind of cut and paste job is not acceptable. Drmies (talk) 23:27, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just want to talk

Please introduce overlinking as a rule. I absolutely loathe to see overlinks, especially ones like this: Italian. Still waiting for the 6 months to be over. Once they are, I'll continue my conquest to fight overlinking. --Ireadbooks12 (talk) 11:46, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, also, strictly forbid any usage of the full names of countries on any pages, other than the countries themselves. It takes up important bytes. --Ireadbooks12 (talk) 11:47, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it. You are blocked. You have access to this talk page solely so you can request an unblock. --Yamla (talk) 12:37, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Silent Bay Studios

Hello, Ireadbooks12. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Silent Bay Studios, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shilla (genre)

Hello, Ireadbooks12. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shilla (genre), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Silent Bay Studios

Hello, Ireadbooks12. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Silent Bay Studios".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:29, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shilla (genre)

Hello, Ireadbooks12. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shilla".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ireadbooks12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Been a while, hasn't it? I have read nearly all rules of Wikipedia, and I know what "reliable source" means. Also, I want to help in fighting overlinking. Ireadbooks12 (talk) 10:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This isn't convincing, nor does it even attempt to address your violations of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Yamla (talk) 10:20, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: How am I able to "address my WP:SOCK violations"? --Ireadbooks12 (talk) 10:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ireadbooks12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read WP:RS and promise to link reliable sources. I am confused about how I am able to "address my violations of WP:SOCK and WP:EVASION.", though.

Decline reason:

I would be nice about this except for the fact that your last two requests show an apparently willful attempt to ignore the concerns raised about your socking and block evasions. So you can't get away with that again, we are formally asking you to disclose any other accounts you have edited under so that we may be assured of your intent to use this account and only this account in the future. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:11, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.