User talk:It1224

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Epiphany Lutheran Church LCMS has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Gnowor^Talk2Me_{did wha?} 19:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. Didn't realize you were the article author. I've tagged the page for speedy deletion assuming that is what you intended by blanking the page. If that's incorrect, please feel free to restore your content. Thanks so much for your contributions!Gnowor^Talk2Me_{did wha?} 19:19, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping. it1224

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures) please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Gnowor^Talk2Me_{did wha?} 19:26, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent uploads did not appear to be constructive and has been or soon will be deleted. Please read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The legoland photos are fine for commons, but are not encyclopedic. Please do not add them to articles. Thanks. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 13:29, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from uploading disruptive images with no encyclopedic value, such as Hans Christian Andersen. It is considered vandalism. Thank you. Danmuz (talk) 14:05, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. These Legoland reproductions are pretty amazing, but I agree with ChrisRuvolo and Danmuz that the have little value in the articles, since we have pictures there of the actual buildings. I note that they are your photos, so of course you'd like them to be seen. You might be able to use some of them in the Legoland article, but otherwise you'll have to be satisfied with knowing that when readers click through to the Commons categories for these buildings, they'll see your pictures then. I would advise you not to add your shots to any more building articles, as they'll most likely be deleted. Sorry about that, Beyond My Ken (talk) 15:50, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guys, I thought it would be relevant considering especially Lego and Hans Christian Anderson are danish and oriented towards children. So excusing that architectural models are significant to the buildings page, please pardon me. However, I have as far as I know I've created and cross referenced the only catalog of the few hundred or so NYC, DC, San Fran,etc., buildings they feature. How about a page featuring a table with thumbnails of both the model and actual buildings, address, park, emporis etc, etc? I'd be very excited to start it. --it1224

Hi. I think that would be okay on the Legoland pages or on commons. Very cool models. Cheers. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 19:00, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Legoland Miniland New York City.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Lego K^ontribs T^alkM 01:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Good work on Lida Moser $Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...)$ 14:48, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Legoland Miniland New York City

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Legoland Miniland New York City, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Blank page

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:38, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Legoland Miniland Washington DC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Legoland Miniland Washington DC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legoland Miniland Washington DC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 04:01, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Legoland Miniland New York City

Hello It1224. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Legoland Miniland New York City.

If you no longer want this submission, it will shortly be deleted. However, if you wish to keep it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Legoland Miniland New York City}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will place the undeleted submission in your user space.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. j⚛e decker ^talk 14:04, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Epiphany Lutheran Church (Lake Worth, Florida) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Epiphany Lutheran Church (Lake Worth, Florida) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epiphany Lutheran Church (Lake Worth, Florida) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. schetm (talk) 06:29, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]