Jump to content

User talk:J2009j

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Demeter39G per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Demeter39G. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Izno (talk) 04:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock| Hi! How is this related? This is an older account I have had. It was never used for any votes or anything similar with another account. Please, go ahead and verify yourself. The log in is saved on different devices. I used whatever the page was open. You wrote yourself that- Note that multiple accounts are allowed } 2603:8000:B640:3550:5D79:C382:CE05:17B3 (talk) 02:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • This unblock request is wrongly formatted, so it won't be included in the list of pending unblock requests. I would correct that misformatting for you if you had posted the request from your account, but there's no point, because unblock requests made without logging into the relevant account aren't considered anyway.
  • I find it very difficult to reconcile these two edits [1] [2]] with what you have said above. JBW (talk) 21:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi! What do you mean by this?"I find it very difficult to reconcile these two edits [1] [2]] " I always keep my feed clean. You can see the edits history that I always clean it. Here [2]] is literally a reply to the person who commented on the article I created. J2009j (talk) 22:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

J2009j (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am repeating the same again. How is this related? This is an older account I have had. It was never used for any votes or anything similar with another account. Please, go ahead and verify yourself. The log in is saved on different devices. I used whatever the page was open. You wrote yourself that- Note that multiple accounts are allowed.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am repeating the same again. How is this related? This is an older account I have had. It was never used for any votes or anything similar with another account. Please, go ahead and verify yourself. The log in is saved on different devices. I used whatever the page was open. You wrote yourself that- Note that multiple accounts are allowed.  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am repeating the same again. How is this related? This is an older account I have had. It was never used for any votes or anything similar with another account. Please, go ahead and verify yourself. The log in is saved on different devices. I used whatever the page was open. You wrote yourself that- Note that multiple accounts are allowed.  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am repeating the same again. How is this related? This is an older account I have had. It was never used for any votes or anything similar with another account. Please, go ahead and verify yourself. The log in is saved on different devices. I used whatever the page was open. You wrote yourself that- Note that multiple accounts are allowed.  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

J2009j (talk) 22:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you mean by your "feed", or by keeping it clean, but can you explain why you used the account Demeter39G to edit User talk:J2009j, and then one minute later use the account J2009j to revert that edit? There may be a perfectly good reason; if so it will help if you can let us know what that reason is. Many administrators will have seen this kind if thing many times, and there is a very common reason why it happens, but unless you tell us, we can't know whether that reason applies in this case, or whether you had some other reason. JBW (talk) 13:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean the talk page. I always keep it clean. I noticed that I accidentally removed the the block that had the button to reply, and maybe some Information I needed to remember. What is the issue about that? It was never used for any votes or anything similar with another account. Please, go ahead and verify yourself. J2009j (talk) 18:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]