User talk:JFZ0413

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Natural nuclear fission reactor, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! DanCherek (talk) 04:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hi JFZ0413! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. BerryForPerpetuity (talk) 14:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Your edit to Natural nuclear fission reactor has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 09:00, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'm going to ask you to read WP:SELFCITE. That article was not about French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission or you, so mentioning yourself and your colleagues in the lead is not appropriate. While you can still edit on enWiki, despite your current block on frWiki, you cannot continue the same behaviour. If you continue to violate enWiki policies, such as introducing copyrighted content, incorrectly marking your edits as minor, or adding unsourced additions to articles, you can also be blocked here. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 09:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:JFZ0413. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 16:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The text on Oklo includes an error: An analysis carried out in the Pierrelatte plant detected the depletion of a sample of uranium 0.7171%, while the content of natural uranium is 0.7202%. The sample was a mixture of batches of uranium from different mines operated in France, Gabon and Niger. Isotopic analyses showed the presence of very depleted uranium from the Oklo mine in Gabon. Furthermore, the hypothesis of the manufacture of nuclear weapons was never mentioned, because enriching uranium by gaseous diffusion to 235U contents greater than 90% requires gigantic installations.

Then a paragraph is devoted to uranium 234. This paragraph is useless, because 234U, although it has undergone variations, has played a very secondary role in the fission of uranium. Moreover, as indicated, 234U has a relatively short radioactive period, the variations in its content are no longer muserable today.

I propose to write a paragraph on the discovery of Oklo, similar to the one I wrote in the French version of Wikipedia, with in particular the photo of the photo plate of the mass spectrometer of a sample of Oklo ore, proof of the presence of fission products.Photo that I took and which only appears in the publication that I made on the occasion of the fiftieth anniversary of the discovery of Oklo: From routine sample measurements in CEA to the Oklo phenomenon. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2023 Nov 2; 199(18):2258-2261 JFZ0413 (talk) 16:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]