User talk:JayMithila

This is JayMithila's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pramod Kumar Yadav (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Pramod Kumar Yadav instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please compare and combine draft and article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pramod Kumar Yadav and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pramod Kumar Yadav, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:22, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JayMithila! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:22, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: This article is on MLA Pramod Kumar Yadav of Siraha while the other main article Pramod Kumar Yadav is of MP and politician from Rupandehi. Actually, both these politician have same name. JayMithila (talk) 19:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:JayMithila - Are these two different people with the same name? If so, do you want me to disambiguate and resubmit the draft? Robert McClenon (talk) 21:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon:, better move the new article to Pramod Kumar Yadav (Siraha politician) with former as it is. He is a vital personality, national MP. JayMithila (talk) 09:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Om Prakash Sharma (Nepali politician)

added a link pointing to Parsa

Ram Saroj Yadav

added a link pointing to Dhanusha

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category creation.

Hello! I found you active. Province no 2 has been renamed as Madhesh Province. therefore I request creating Category:Nepali Congress politicians from Madhesh Province based on politicians from our province. And hence link it to Category:Nepali Congress politicians, Category:Madhesh Province.103.10.28.178 (talk) 09:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done.✓ JayMithila (talk) 09:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Integrated Centre of Trade Unions, Nepal

The article Integrated Centre of Trade Unions, Nepal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It is a sister organization of Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Socialist). There is no independent notablity required as per WP:ORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. nirmal (talk) 10:51, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nepali Congress/meta/symbol

Template:Nepali Congress/meta/symbol has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:03, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jagannath Paudel moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jagannath Paudel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 04:54, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of chairpersons of rural municipalities in Nepal moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of chairpersons of rural municipalities in Nepal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marchawari Rural Municipality, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tharu and Kalwar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, JayMithila

Thank you for creating 2022 Bharatpur municipal election.

User:Owlf, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thankyou for your active contribution related to local election of Nepal.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Owlf}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Owlf 📪 11:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nagendra Chaudhary

Hello, JayMithila

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Nagendra Chaudhary, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing image size.

I ask you to please stop removing the image_size tag on all the election pages. [1], this link shows the difference with and without image size. Without the image_size, the infobox takes up more than half of the page. I hope you understand why I want the image_size tag to stay the way it is. Thank you. RulesTheNation (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RulesTheNation:, Please stay calm. I am also a tech student. Please confirm. [2] So, better don't show me differences. I know image size and wiki editing is not any new to me. I am clear to your intensions. Please stay away from your political affiliation if any. And yes, 150x150px is the most used image size on wiki which you can see in the following articles. 2017 Nepalese local elections, 2019 Indian general election Even international editors use 200x200px. Please confirm it here. 2020 United States presidential election This is because image size lesser than 150px is not included in article preview. That's the reason I am doing the reverts. Keep in mind I have longer journey here and i edit with certain reason. Every thing is not to be explained ahead. Better find differences between your edits and international editing practice. You have a long journey ahead and i congratulate you for that to have no editing conflict. Thank you!JayMithila (talk) 17:21, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The image size is for 3x4 portraits in almost all the elections that you just linked. The election symbols are not 3x4 and thus take up a large space when they are in 150px. There is no standard for symbols especially when it looks very disruptive.

Save me on the condescending lectures. I have been here far longer than you and this is a new account is all. Don't question my neutrality when I know what your affiliation and have seen clearly biased edits by you in some articles. RulesTheNation (talk) 17:37, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RulesTheNation: And a final request, do as per international editing practice keeping 150x150px image in infobox. And consider moving the ward results below to infobox, most preferable in ward results section which seems most suitable. One last edit and leave them ideal now.JayMithila (talk) 17:28, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your accusations say more about you than me. I can honestly say that my former account is Vanished user 1932142 (talk · contribs). RulesTheNation (talk) 18:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dhanraj Acharya moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dhanraj Acharya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Curious boy km per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Curious boy km. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 12:18, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kishori Sah

Hello, JayMithila

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Curbon7, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Kishori Sah, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Curbon7}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Curbon7 (talk) 16:39, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manoj Kumar Sah

Hello, JayMithila

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Manoj Kumar Sah, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:02, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Manoj Kumar Sah

Hello, JayMithila, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Manoj Kumar Sah, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Kumar Sah.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:33, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]