User talk:JelloMello24

April 2022

Hello, I'm Bruce1ee. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Outline of Wikipedia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. —Bruce1ee ^talk 15:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 14:19, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sphilbrick i understand JelloMello24 (talk) 14:20, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to List of serial killers by number of victims—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 22:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Glane23 ... Kill all. JelloMello24 (talk) 22:10, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Sexual activity—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 17:53, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you introduce jokes into articles, as you did at Sexual activity. Jay 💬 18:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to China, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ~ANM🐁 T·C 13:51, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bucharest, you may be blocked from editing. CodeTalker (talk) 14:01, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CodeTalker how bout no JelloMello24 (talk) 15:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:36, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]