User talk:Jenny1687

Nomination of The Secret Story of Santa Claus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Secret Story of Santa Claus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Secret Story of Santa Claus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Agtx (talk) 02:19, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Jenny1687. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:49, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have to ask: are you a freelancer that took an assignment to come on to Wikipedia and create these articles? If so, you need to look over Wikipedia's policies on editing with a conflict of interest (I've posted a brief synopsis of this above) and read over this essay about paid editing. I'd also recommend that you read over the basic guidelines on editing: WP:RS, WP:GNG, WP:NPOV, and so on. All editors are expected to follow these guidelines but paid editors will have to pay particularly close attention since they will be under far more scrutiny. If you are a paid editor then you will need to disclose this on your userpage and show which pages you have worked on. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:49, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 19:37, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]