User talk:Johnmatt1

Welcome!

Hello, Johnmatt1!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Tirishan (talk) 11:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atul Jaiprakash Goel (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Atul Jaiprakash Goel may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:55, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnmatt1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:55, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Johnmatt1! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:01, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm Whpq. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atul Jaiprakash Goel (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DreamRimmer were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atul Jaiprakash Goel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DreamRimmer (talk) 06:33, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Atul Jaiprakash Goel has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Atul Jaiprakash Goel. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:36, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Atul Jaiprakash Goel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Atul Jaiprakash Goel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 09:38, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, Johnmatt1. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created Draft:Atul Jaiprakash Goel has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see WP:CORP for subjects that are groups or companies or organizations. Please see WP:ANYBIO for subjects who are people. Please see Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid here and here. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles.

A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.

CV's/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk, and on IRC chat. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to request restoration at WP:Deletion review Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:53, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you soo much for giving me a chance to rewrite the content. Johnmatt1 (talk) 09:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not able to request the restoration of the page, can you please help me. Johnmatt1 (talk) 10:06, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Posted to DRV. The instructiions are somewhat daunting. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:18, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you soo much. Johnmatt1 (talk) 11:12, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear -- Deepfriedokra,

The page has been deleted again can you please help me on this. Johnmatt1 (talk) 14:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has not been redeleted. It is under discussion. It was only restored for WP:DRV -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Atul Jaiprakash Goel has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Atul Jaiprakash Goel. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:14, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sandstein 11:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you see: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 July 12, I have requested for editing the content but someone have deleted the page and i have rewrote the whole content taking a months of time and then i have requested for the draft.

Please review the content once because now i don't think it is promotional content, as i have given my hard work in it and have kept encyclopedic tone in mind while creating the content for the page. Johnmatt1 (talk) 11:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnmatt1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have created a page named Draft:Atul Jaiprakash Goel multiple times and I agree to that, but last time I requested and was told that I would write the content once again in a formal, neutral encyclopedic tone and I have done that and have created the draft again but User:Sandstein had deleted the draft and blocked me to do any further things that were remaining to add the reference. Johnmatt1 (talk) 11:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes. You once again failed to write the content in a non-promotional manner. It appears you are only here to promote people. Hence the block. Yamla (talk) 12:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla I request you to please check the content once again as I have written it in a formal, neutral encyclopedic tone and I am not promoting anyone here, my humble request you to is please help me in this regards. Johnmatt1 (talk) 01:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The content was nowhere near appropriate for an encyclopedia. --Yamla (talk) 09:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please unblock me so that i can rewrite the content. Johnmatt1 (talk) 12:23, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. --Yamla (talk) 12:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnmatt1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have created a page named Draft:Atul Jaiprakash Goel multiple times and I agree to that, but last time I requested and was told that I would write the content once again in a formal, neutral encyclopedic tone and I have done that and have created the draft again but User:Sandstein had deleted the draft and blocked me to do any further things that were remaining to add the reference.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Yash Vardhan Swami

Hello, Johnmatt1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yash Vardhan Swami".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]