User talk:JosephPappano

January 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 1987 have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: 1987 was changed by JosephPappano (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886467 on 2021-01-18T23:14:32+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 1987. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lana Del Rey, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Lana Del Rey was changed by JosephPappano (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884468 on 2021-01-18T23:46:32+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JosephPappano (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for my disruptive behavior JosephPappano (talk) 22:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Good. I'm sure you understand, with your disruptive behaviour and sockpuppetry, there's no chance you'll be unblocked any time soon. Yamla (talk) 00:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request #2, January 20, 2021

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JosephPappano (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I first vandalized some pages on Wikipedia. 1. Read the guide. 2. This blocking administrator blocked me. 3. Administrators can block users. JosephPappano (talk) 21:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Pcgmsrich sock. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.