User talk:Jthj2012

Dhoom 3

Please discuss it here 1. Thanks. Fideliosr (talk) 09:43, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE Dhoom 3

hi give me a good reason why to remove a piece of information.thanks

December 2013

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dhoom 3, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Soham (talk) 12:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Dhoom 3 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. A discussion is opened on the talk page discuss there instead or warring. Soham (talk) 12:51, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits have [re-factored others comments, added WP:UNSOURCED content, whacked grammar and tone let alone WP:MOS. Stop this disruptive behaviour otherwise I'll report you to an admin which will lead to a WP:BLOCK, probably indef. Soham (talk) 12:53, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

can you give me any reason why to remove it i will be happy thanks.

No one is asking you to remove anything, just stop your disruption. Soham (talk) 13:12, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TheRedPenOfDoom. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rohit Shetty, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:18, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an ENCYCLOPEDIA, not a Fan page.

re "et the readers see upcoming films that are already filming,its a fact that happy new year will be released.its confirmed upcoming project" wikipedia is WP:NOTADVERT to "let readers know about upcoming events" nor is it a "fact" that a film will be released on an upcoming date, it is only a "fact" that it is "scheduled" for release on a particular date. The article is the FILMography - a list of actual FILMS. adding content about NOT YET FILMS is giving too much emphasis to content about things that dont actually exist in comparison to things that actually do exist. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 10:55, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

calling out non existent projects in a whole section of their own is giving them EVEN MORE weight. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:01, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You and soham should marry each other the perfect couple,happy new year — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jthj2012 (talk • contribs) 07:04, December 30, 2013

re, [1] no, you do not have the right to violate our policy of WP:UNDUE. Please revert yourself. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:16, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Signatures

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 21:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nett . Gross of Tamil and Telugu versions of Dhoom 3

BoxofficeIndia.com has clearly stated that Dhoom 3 nett. grossed Rs 7.25 crore from its Telugu version and Rs 2.75 crore from its Tamil version in its 1st week,thats means a total of Rs 10 crore in its 1st weeek. The sources are: http://www.boxofficeindia.com/boxnewsdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=6351&nCat=

http://www.boxofficeindia.com/boxnewsdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=6348&nCat=

BoxofficeIndia will soon give nett. gross of Dhoom 3 's tamil and telugu versions in week 2 also.

Over that,Dhoom nett. grossed Rs 235 crore from Hindi version in 13 days. Source:

http://www.boxofficeindia.com/boxnewsdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=6356&nCat=

It means a total of Rs 245 crore (Rs 235 cr+Rs 10 cr) from all its versions.All these sources are in that references for Dhoom 3

Its not fault of a Bollywood films that it is also releasing in tamil and telugu also. The real *nett gross* includes all versions nett gross. Importantly, the page is for *BOLLYWOOD FILMS* of 2013. its means the nett gross of a bollywoood film in totaily,that means all nett gross of tamil ,telugu and hindi versions.

Similary,Box Office India has given nett. gross of Krrish 3(Hindi) at Rs 177.46 crore and its Tamil and Telugu versions at Rs 10 crore. It means Rs 187.46 crore of Krrish from all its versions.The sources has been given in the Notes section.--Nehapant19 (talk) 04:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/arya 3

Hello Jthj2012. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "arya 3".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/arya 3}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 22:37, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at WP:Checkuser. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 21:16, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Main Hogaya Tumhara for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Main Hogaya Tumhara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Main Hogaya Tumhara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Happy New Year (2014 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Fan (film)

Hi there, please make comments on the article via the talk page rather than in the article itself. Thank you! Mediavalia ^talk 15:19, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively you may add {{Db-userreq}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. See WP:FAKEARTICLE; userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Geniac (talk) 23:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shriya Pilgaonkar

The article Shriya Pilgaonkar was redirected following this discussion. Please don't restore the article unless you get the redirect overturned at deletion review. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 11:18, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CNWK Episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kapil Sharma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

INRConvert

We are avoiding INRConvert in the infoboxes now per the discussions at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Use_of_.7B.7BINRConvert.7D.7D_in_infobox. BollyJeff | talk 02:16, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jthj2012. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jthj2012. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kisi Se Dil Lagaake Dekho for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kisi Se Dil Lagaake Dekho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kisi Se Dil Lagaake Dekho until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitro talk 20:38, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

e

koi news yeh show kab ayega Humari kahani Abmemon89 (talk) 10:15, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jthj2012. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]