User talk:Kailanmapper

This user may have left Wikipedia. Kailanmapper has not edited Wikipedia since July 6, 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hi Kailanmapper! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 21:29, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brill. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Revolt of Hasan Khan Salar has been accepted

Revolt of Hasan Khan Salar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Antan O 06:08, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User page

I understand the frustration vis. the recent disruptive editing at Hotak dynasty, but stuff like this[1] will easily be misconstrued as a WP:BATTLE mentality. I highly advise you to remove it from your userpage. Thanks, - LouisAragon (talk) 22:44, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping resolve the issue, first of all. I really appreciate your help. And I understand what you mean now after having read the battleground section, I will take notice of this in the future and will remove it immediately. Kailanmapper (talk) 22:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! - LouisAragon (talk) 10:28, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tabriz Khanate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Herat Campaign of 1731, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khorasan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Herat Campaign of 1862-63, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglo-Sikh War.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New stub article in Afghanistan WikiProject

Hello. I am just letting active members of the Afghanistan WikiProject know that Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan–United States relations started a few days ago and need a lot of work. Elijahandskip (talk) 02:12, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

TrangaBellam (talk) 19:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By consensus, we do not use Raj-era sources in articles concerned with S. Asia; there isn't any dearth of modern scholarship. I assume that you take responsibility for all the restored content? TrangaBellam (talk) 19:28, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For example, lines like the Royal guard had [...] smashed the rebelling Sardars. Or that TSD faced widespread revolts due to a stain in image after breaking an oath taken on Koran. Or ... TrangaBellam (talk) 19:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Even though it's an old source, the information is mostly reliable. Again, just because it is old does not mean you can't use the source in a Wikipedia. Also your claim that no Raj-era sources can't be used in South Asia articles isn't true, the modern sources are PREFERRED over older sources but that does not mean in any way that we cannot use those old sources. If this consensus really is true, then link the discussion that resulted in that ruling. If you want, I can introduce more modern scholarship into this article, but removing all that sourced content was not the correct action to do. Old sources are the foundations for modern historical scholarship, there are millions of examples I could list out there of articles using old sources. So your reasoning doesn't make any sense. Kailanmapper (talk) 19:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Even though it's an old source, the information is mostly reliable. - Like claiming in wiki-voice about TSD facing widespread revolts due to a stain in image after breaking an oath taken on Koran?

There are multiple scattered discussions - I found this. Follow the tracks. TrangaBellam (talk) 21:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe not widespread revolts but Timur Shah breaking an oath on the Quran is cited in multiple sources. Besides the British Raj book, it is said that such an event occured in Fayz Muhammad Kitab Hazarah's Siraj-al Tawarikh (considered one of the most important sources on the history of modern Afghanistan by multiple scholars). The book "Afghanistan: A History from 1260 to the Present" also correlates this infomation: "An envoy was then sent to Arsala Khan bearing a Qur’an with the king’s oath promising his life would be spared if he came in person and tendered his submission. Arsala Khan took Timur Shah at his word, but when he arrived in Peshawar he was arrested and his throat cut. The Mohmands and other tribes of the Khyber region were disgusted at the king’s breach of his sacred oath and never forgot, or forgave, this act of treachery.10" So it seems that the information was correct, although worded incorrectly. And that other discussion was mainly talking about ethnography (although it did discuss history as well). Biased and racist sources usually depend on the source, some are more biased than others. I still am of the opinion that it's fine to use old sources as long as that information is correlated with other sources. Maybe we should bring in other editors to see their opinion on this issue. Kailanmapper (talk) 22:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Ahmed Jan" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ahmed Jan. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 7#Ahmed Jan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:31, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by tagging

Hi, Please refrain from drive-by tagging, like you did on OpIndia and Love Jihad. — DaxServer (talk to me) 19:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Khowar

Hey! I'm writing this to let you know that the spelling "کھووار" is actually the correct form and "خووار" is incorrect. This is because the "Kh" in Khowar is actually representing kʰ, or the aspirated k sound. Essentially, the "Kh" in Khowar is pronounced like a k with an h and not x. I edited and fixed this. Thank you! ThatDohDude (talk) 23:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then. Thank you for correcting my mistake. Kailanmapper (talk) 15:03, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shirvan Khanate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranians.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

Btw, perhaps these maps by some of our best editors might serve as an inspiration [2] [3]. Many of Ian Mladjovs maps are quite nice too [4] --HistoryofIran (talk) 00:32, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AA2 advisory

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- LouisAragon (talk) 13:04, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dungan Revolt (1862–1877), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ili and Dungan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Afghanistan Star
		For great contributions to help toward parts of uncovered Afghan History. Noorullah21 (talk) 01:45, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noorullah21 (talk) 01:45, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My comment

Please, Iranian people, do not disgrace yourself instead of forging and lying. The whole world understands this. We are complaining about you. Stop your illusion, Pan Pars. Arieina monni (talk) 19:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --HistoryofIran (talk) 16:39, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Herat (1793–1863), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nimazandyf (talk • contribs) 21:42, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 1DHNK1 (talk) 15:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I reverted your edits thinking they were related to [earlier case of vandalism] that happened on the page. I should have looked at the sources before reverting your edits instead of assuming. Kailanmapper (talk) 14:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of popular place names, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aliabad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]