User talk:Kedokinnie

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Strangers Dancing! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Sennecaster (Chat) 02:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Jackson

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:10, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

re photos

Firstly, and the main reason I wanted to make this talk message quickly - I apologize for my edit summary. When I saw the edit in my watchlist I didn't realize there was a second one with an explanation, so, I'm sorry, you did. Now for my response: I think the best response is simply... why? I have a huge monitor at home. At full screen on the version with 75px, I can see 12 entries. With 200px, I can only see five. How does that help me? On my phone, I can see 5 at a time, and their names; with 200px, it's absolutely unusable. I literally cannot see the names next to the pictures.

If someone wants to make the picture fullscreen, it's one tap or click away. We don't need to do it for them. --Golbez (talk) 01:31, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

       I suppose you are right, i for one liked having them large because on my monitor they are quite small and i thought for others they would be quite small aswell. i do think that 75px is too small though and a more generous resolution of 160px like what is used on the List of Presidents of The United States would be better. Kedokinnie (talk) 03:00, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree and think they should make theirs smaller. If you think it's too small then I don't understand why the rest of us should have to deal with that - increase the size on your browser or click the pictures. It's a table of information, not a picture gallery. --Golbez (talk) 04:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your revision of 12:29, April 10, 2024 of Agnes Vernon stating "the photos wasnt even from 1915."

You recently removed an image I uploaded claiming it was incorrectly dated. This image was copied from an issue of The Moving Picture World dated September 4, 1915, The article states Agnes Vernon is 19 years old. Why do you have doubts this image was not created in 1915?
url = https://archive.org/details/movingpicturewor25newy/page/n1698/mode/1up
Michael Jannetta (talk) 18:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this image is not captioned as being from 1915, unless specifically stated please do not specify otherwise Kedokinnie (talk) 18:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]