User talk:Kettleonwater
Kettleonwater, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Kettleonwater! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC) |
bitxh As
June 2016
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to In the Aeroplane Over the Sea, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Robvanvee 09:04, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Aki Toyosaki Portrait.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Aki Toyosaki Portrait.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 22:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sketches of Brunswick East King Gizzard.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Sketches of Brunswick East King Gizzard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Kettleonwater. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 30
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Konoyo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ambient, Electronic and Drone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Kettleonwater. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]December 2019
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to SpongeBob SquarePants, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 02:57, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on SpongeBob SquarePants; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury • 03:08, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 16
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Push the Feeling On, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Reid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Viper Shoe Selfie.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Viper Shoe Selfie.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hoary (talk) 05:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Cobra (rapper)
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Cobra (rapper) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:49, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of DieManBack
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on DieManBack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:50, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Cobra the rapper.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Cobra the rapper.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Viper the rapper's face.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Viper the rapper's face.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:41, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
All of these weird things have permission and Viper actually told me to do them, but this is the only thing that makes sense to keep. I've asked him to email permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Kettleonwater (talk) 11:42, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:DieManBack.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:DieManBack.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:43, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Cobra the rapper.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Cobra the rapper.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Orphaned non-free image File:Viper the Rapper's face.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Viper the Rapper's face.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Viper the Rapper's face.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Viper the Rapper's face.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:38, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Whpq: Hi, I noticed you put the image of Viper up for deletion. I can confirm I have full permission by the subject of the article (Mr. Lee Carter) to put his picture on the page as an object of identification, and that he actively wants it to be there, as per https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/695843896361484378/763746370125037568/Screenshot_20201008-075344.png. I admit this proof is a little dodgy - I still have no idea if he actually sent the email or not. If you require more proof to his consent for the picture to be used on the page then I'll try and get a full statement out of him. If it's not that and there's something wrong with the submitting process that I have done please tell me exactly what to do. Thank you Kettleonwater (talk) 13:47, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- The issue is not one of consent. The image is licensed as non-free content. Use of non-free content must meet all of the non-free content criteria. Specifically, this fails WP:NFCC#1 as the image could be replaced with a freely licensed one. Note that it doesn't matter if a free image does not currently exist. The fact the subject is a living person means one could reasonably expect a free image could be created by somebody taking a photo of the subject under a free license. -- Whpq (talk) 14:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Would the image pass WP:NFCC#1 if Viper changes the license to free-license? He took the picture himself. Kettleonwater (talk) 14:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- If the image is released under a free license, then non-free content policy no longer applies. Note that he would need to confirm the licensing by sending in permission. Posting a photo of a permission on discord is not likely going to be accepted. See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries. -- Whpq (talk) 15:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Whpq: I am going to get him to fill out and send the declaration of consent now. Could you please delay the auto-delete of the image file a little bit to give him some time to respond? It would be appreciated. Thank you for guiding me on how to do this sort of thing correctly :) Kettleonwater (talk) 21:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- You should update the file information to remove the non-free licensing information and add whichever license is being applied This is typically {{cc-by-sa-4.0}} for image files. You should also add the {{information}} template with the various fields filled in as appropriate. You then need to note that OTRS permission is on its way. You do this by adding {{subst:op}} to the file information. -- Whpq (talk) 00:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Whpq: I am going to get him to fill out and send the declaration of consent now. Could you please delay the auto-delete of the image file a little bit to give him some time to respond? It would be appreciated. Thank you for guiding me on how to do this sort of thing correctly :) Kettleonwater (talk) 21:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- If the image is released under a free license, then non-free content policy no longer applies. Note that he would need to confirm the licensing by sending in permission. Posting a photo of a permission on discord is not likely going to be accepted. See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries. -- Whpq (talk) 15:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Would the image pass WP:NFCC#1 if Viper changes the license to free-license? He took the picture himself. Kettleonwater (talk) 14:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- The issue is not one of consent. The image is licensed as non-free content. Use of non-free content must meet all of the non-free content criteria. Specifically, this fails WP:NFCC#1 as the image could be replaced with a freely licensed one. Note that it doesn't matter if a free image does not currently exist. The fact the subject is a living person means one could reasonably expect a free image could be created by somebody taking a photo of the subject under a free license. -- Whpq (talk) 14:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Per WP:EXISTING, do not add albums to navigational templates that do not have articles
[edit]You have previously edited Template:King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard and added a link to an article that did not exist at the time. Per WP:EXISTING, navigational templates are a collection of links to existing articles, not links to redirects or red links. Please either write the article first before adding the link (WP:WTAF), or leave it out until somebody else has made one for what you're adding. Thank you. Ss112 00:05, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
[edit]Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Butterfly 3000, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Ss112 07:07, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Donda (album) disruptive editing
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. I've tried engaging in a conversation with you on the article talk to resolve the dispute.
The fact that you assume that something might be covered in the future is no justification for inclusion, see WP:CRYSTAL. Your contribution is still original research, which is prohibited under any circumstance on Wikipedia, and speculative at that. Please take your time to read those policies and keep them in mind when editing in the future. Thank you. Throast (talk | contribs) 23:00, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Throast (talk | contribs) 01:04, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
September 2021
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Life of Pablo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 17:23, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
- Now sourced. Kettleonwater (talk) 20:56, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Oddments King Gizzard.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Oddments King Gizzard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Donda critical reception
[edit]Hello, I want to notify you that it was not me who changed the phrasing in the critical reception section as you claimed here. Do you even look at edit histories and/or read edit summaries? If you want to take up this issue again, please do so with Kyle Peake who changed the section in this edit. Throast (talk | contribs) 11:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- after the weird admin report how could i not think it was you lol, apologies anyway Kettleonwater (talk) 13:46, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
smh Throast (talk | contribs) 13:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Files listed for discussion
[edit]Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 December 3 if you are interested in preserving their usage.
Thank you. Sr. Knowthing ¿señor? 17:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 16
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Legacy of Lunatic Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lunarian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Bad Apple on a TI-84+ SE calculator.webm listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bad Apple on a TI-84+ SE calculator.webm, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kartëhl (October 24)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kartëhl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Butterfly 3000 cover.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Butterfly 3000 cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)