User talk:KistMarket

April 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Blighty (TV channel) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Blighty (TV channel) was changed by KistMarket (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888195 on 2019-04-01T11:11:58+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bankster (talk) 19:49, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your vandalism and unsourced changes; they have all been reverted. Nate • (chatter) 17:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Sorry, user blocked by El C because for reason this.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 17:46, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TonelMarket, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Jalen D. Folf (talk) 00:56, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunday Service Coachella performance, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 11:14, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Sunday Service Coachella performance. Shellwood (talk) 11:16, 28 April 2019 (UTC) STOP IT[reply]

Sources, Redirect or Articles for Deletion

Hello,

If you want 100% Hell to not be a redirect, then you need to find 2 good sources for it. I couldn't find 1 reliable/in-depth one, but I'll be happy if you do. Otherwise it's got to go to Articles for Deletion for a more in-depth consideration.

Articles can't just remain without proving their notability.

Nosebagbear (talk) 11:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Separate Message

I will not block you because investigation sock puppeteer TonelMarket is getting block you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.1.247.189 (talk) 11:56, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Hi, if you continue causing problems, your account is likely to be blocked indefinitely without further warning. If you want to join us as an editor, you're most welcome to do so, but you have to behave responsibly. Many thanks, SarahSV ^(talk) 00:16, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]