User talk:Kithousefans

This is Kithousefans's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Kithousefans, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Stalwart111 00:00, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to the Teahouse.

Hello! Kithousefans, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Mat ty.007 18:01, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Template-style welcome-message follows. Please forgive the one-tone-fits-all phrasing!

Hello, Kithousefans, welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are a few pages that you might find interesting and helpful:

Editing: The concise cheatsheet, or the short introduction guide
Articles: WP:42 summarizes how we decide on an article's existence and contents
Overview: The WP:Five pillars, are our condensed philosophy and policies
WP:Featured article criteria, the standard that all articles are trying to achieve (eventually)

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date.

Don't be afraid of making mistakes, as all changes are kept, and problems can be easily reverted with the "history" tab of each page.

If you need help, check out WP:Questions, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Buster Seven Talk 14:16, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Modern reproduction of a Sears Hillrose catalog house in Battle Ground Indiana.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Modern reproduction of a Sears Hillrose catalog house in Battle Ground Indiana.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:36, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Sears Magnolia in Benson, North Carolina.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sears Magnolia in Benson, North Carolina.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:37, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Image of the column detail of a Sears Vallonia.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Image of the column detail of a Sears Vallonia.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:37, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Photo of stamped lumber found in a Sears catalog house.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Photo of stamped lumber found in a Sears catalog house.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:38, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kit Houses of Ypsilanti, Michigan

The article Kit Houses of Ypsilanti, Michigan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't think it would be appropriate to list a bunch of addresses of private homes on WP even if the subject were encyclopedic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 02:09, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kit Houses of Ypsilanti, Michigan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kit Houses of Ypsilanti, Michigan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kit Houses of Ypsilanti, Michigan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:19, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kit Houses of Ann Arbor, Michigan

The article Kit Houses of Ann Arbor, Michigan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't think a list of addresses of private homes would be appropriate for Wikipedia to host even if the subject were encyclopedic (coverage in the most local of local newspapers, distributed free to all residents of Ann Arbor, won't cut it).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussions

In discussions, you can indent your comments using multiple colons for each level ( :: ) and sign your comments using four tildes ( ~~~~ ). Cheers, Stalwart111 23:59, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:32, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kit Houses of Ann Arbor, Michigan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kit Houses of Ann Arbor, Michigan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kit Houses of Ann Arbor, Michigan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:26, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion...

Having a think about it, I suspect part of the problem here is the creation of articles about kit houses in distinct geographical areas small enough so that the subject of kit homes in those areas is really only of interest to people in those areas. Perhaps it would be more worth your while creating an article that deals with kit houses on a scale that might be considered of value to readers, backed by a wider range of sources. It strikes me that while the Ypsi and Ann articles might not have enough sources each, those sources combined might allow for the creation of quite a good article focused on Kit houses in Michigan as a fork from the well-sourced Kit houses in North America.

There are numerous kit home companies that were based in Michigan, such that their manufacture in Michigan probably has a unique history of its own. That would allow you to cover kit houses in both places (and others) as well as the history of the multiple Bay City brands. You're fighting what is likely to be a losing battle (honestly, the local sources just aren't strong enough and trying to stretch and strain them to a point where they might be is just going to produce two weak articles in the long term). Why not create one great article and redirect those two titles there? Stalwart111 02:44, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just came back from a walk and had the same thoughts myself while I was out. You are correct that Michigan was homes to several of the main companies and the relevance of the kit homes nationally is well-established. Folding these into an article focused on this topic at a statewide level was the same thought I had while I was out.

I certainly wouldn't have any objection to supporting a redirect of both articles to that new title on that basis. Would you like me to start a new stub article at that title? Stalwart111 03:27, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that would be fine with me.Kithousefans (talk) 03:54, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it might be a good idea to check with Roscelese who had concerns about the original articles. He, quite appropriately, queried whether (even with a Michigan focus) the subject would be notable enough. So I've created a user draft at User:Stalwart111/Kit houses in Michigan for his (and your) consideration. I'll again give him the opportunity to comment before moving that to main space as a potential redirect target. Stalwart111 07:32, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What's the appropriate next steps? I have plenty of sources about kit homes in Michigan. Should those be added? Kithousefans (talk) 11:00, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it! I think it's looking fairly strong and I still think its a better option than separate articles. Stalwart111 12:17, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Query: I'm assuming the IP is you and the rest of the edits were great. Not sure what's wrong with this info though. It was sourced, gave a sense of how prevalent the houses were previously and provided some idea of how they have been treated since - as iconic within those neighbourhoods and communities. The quote, I think, is worth keeping, even if we lose the stuff about the local historical societies. Thoughts? Stalwart111 22:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, those were my edits. I may have gone a bit heavy with the editing. I had asked some kit home experts to review what had been posted so I probably erred on the side of keeping it focused on the main points. I'll go ahead and add that back as those are relevant to that section.Kithousefans (talk) 00:18, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all! Expert advice is always good to have! Stalwart111 00:56, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, I've listed this at WP:DYK (here). Hopefully it will make it onto Wikipedia's front page! Stalwart111 02:16, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Let me know if it does.Kithousefans (talk) 02:32, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I gave you joint credit for the article so you'll get a special notification if it does. Stalwart111 02:53, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that. I've been doing edits for a while on Wikipedia for a while - mostly not with an established account - but I'm not really up on the 'inside' aspects of it.Kithousefans (talk) 03:15, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like you're getting the hang of it - keep up the good work! Stalwart111 07:53, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kit houses in Michigan

On 9 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kit houses in Michigan, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that kit houses manufactured in Michigan were so popular that by 1918, houses from one Bay City company accounted for 2.4% of all housing starts in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kit houses in Michigan. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 17:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2019

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Sears Modern Homes. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. This is not the appropriate way to move a page either. Please wait until a consensus is reached at the requested move you started and a page mover will handle this move for you. Jalen Folf (talk) 06:46, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]