Welcome!

Hello, Kolapoimam, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Kolapoimam, good luck, and have fun. — Newslinger talk 01:48, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What's your claim that this issue at hand is paid editing. None, plus there are no direct contact with the accounts and mine, I don't even know the users. kay 19:30, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

February 2017

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 17:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Ammarpad. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bukola Saraki, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Ammarpad (talk) 10:47, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Demola Adetona (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As plain an advertisement for a non-notable person as you're likely to see. The single source takes me to a site with a virus warning. Super speedy decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Demola Adetona and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Demola Adetona, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 15:15, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Funke Akindele, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 22:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mustapha Lukman (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mustapha Lukman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mustapha Lukman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 11:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kolapoimam, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 11:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mustapha Lukman

Hello Kolapoimam,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mustapha Lukman for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

paul2520 (talk) 13:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Farmcrowdy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Farmcrowdy, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://disrupt-africa.com/2017/12/nigerias-farmcrowdy-raises-1m-seed-funding//. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prof. Daddy Hezekiah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prof. Daddy Hezekiah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WikiVirusC^(talk) 14:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A request has been filed for the title of Prof. Daddy Hezekiah requesting that it be added to the title blacklist. This has been done because the article appears to be a recreation, under a different title, of an article which is itself currently protected against recreation. Please note that titles used to circumvent the protection policy are often given the same level of protection as the original title the author is trying to circumvent, or are added to the title blacklist.

If you feel that the topic of the article meets our notability guidelines, please request a deletion review or use a request for unprotection instead.

Please note that repeated recreation of an article against a consensus to delete is considered disruptive and grounds for a block. Thank you.Yes it was 7 years ago, but adding prof. seems to be trying to avoid the salted page. WikiVirusC^(talk) 14:23, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked. I've moved it for you. If you post an article it will be assessed as it stands. If you don't want that to happen, you should write it as a draft.

I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company organisation claims or interviewing its management. You gave no references at all. . Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourcedclaims presented as fact include: anointed prophet... he was known for being intelligent academically...magnificent temples...
If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for him or the church, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by him or the church, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kolapoimam. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kolapoimam|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read this important guidance.

Also read the message above this one, and note that the article title is not permitted since it includes honorifics.

You must reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prophet Daddy Hezekiah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prophet Daddy Hezekiah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WikiVirusC^(talk) 16:57, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A request has been filed for the title of Prophet Daddy Hezekiah requesting that it be added to the title blacklist. This has been done because the article appears to be a recreation, under a different title, of an article which is itself currently protected against recreation. Please note that titles used to circumvent the protection policy are often given the same level of protection as the original title the author is trying to circumvent, or are added to the title blacklist.

If you feel that the topic of the article meets our notability guidelines, please request a deletion review or use a request for unprotection instead.

Please note that repeated recreation of an article against a consensus to delete is considered disruptive and grounds for a block. Thank you.I suggest using Articles for creation, and creating a draft if you want to start an article for him. Will report after next attempt to evade creation protection. WikiVirusC^(talk) 17:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Techpoint.ng for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Techpoint.ng is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techpoint.ng until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HandsomeBoy (talk) 17:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Kolapoimam, during AfD you use the project page not the talk page to present your argument. And what they meant by that is they don't think the subject (Techpoint.ng) is notable enough to have an entry in Wikipedia. If you think otherwise, you should discuss your argument using policies and guidlines. Cheers

Regards,

Mahveo (talk) 07:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Techpoint.ng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tech (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Demola Adetona

A tag has been placed on Demola Adetona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A complete mess of an article, with a batch of dubious, poorly-formatted, sources, in an overtly promotional tone, about a non-notable person. And created by an author who specialises in such articles, and almost certainly has an undeclared Coi.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KJP1 (talk) 16:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prof Daddy Hezekiah

A tag has been placed on Prof Daddy Hezekiah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Truly awful article that covers the same subject as the speedily deleted Draft:Prophet Daddy Hezekiah. With two exceptions, Sources 3 and 9, every other source is either directly to the subject's sites, or to a site connected to him. The 2 exceptions do not appear to be neutral, reliable sources, e.g. Source 9 reports that the subject has raised the dead. The tone is overtly promotional and the sourcing gives no confidence as to reliability, neutrality or notability. And created by an author who specialises in such articles, and almost certainly has an undeclared Coi.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KJP1 (talk) 16:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mustapha Lukman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mustapha Lukman. Thanks! KJP1 (talk) 23:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sunday Oluwole Otokiti

A tag has been placed on Sunday Oluwole Otokiti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"At Ogbomosho, God endowed him with a miraculous and unimaginable skill of fine Art." Really? Articles like this are an embarrassment to Wikipedia. The sourcing is poor, the content is rubbish. And created by an author who specialises in such articles, and almost certainly has an undeclared Coi.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KJP1 (talk) 23:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Kolapoimam, trust you're good!

I'm Mahveotm and we probably have must have crossed paths a couple of times on the Wiki. I see you've stopped editing a month ago and I'd like to say this. Wikipedia values you! Yes it does. Every individual makes this place what it is and the fact that you're not producing GA class articles does not make you less an editor than people who do. You most probably must have had an hard time seeing articles you tediously wrote deleted for several reasons, some you probably contested and nobody seemed to have responded to. It works this way, those editors were not specifically after you, sometimes they come across articles that are not fit to be in an Encyclopedia (of which WIkipedia is one). To maintain the sanity of this place and avouid it being used as a sand box and home for reckless POV's, such articles are deleted. Sometimes also, articles are deleted because they are simply not notable enough to be in an Encyclopedia. Take for instance (was it techpont.ng that was recently nominated for deletion by handsomeboy) an article of yours that was deleted. I can boldly tell you HnandsomeBoy has nothing against you! He's the coordinator for the Nigerian WIkiproject and more than any Wikipedian would be willing to help you around your way here. When he stumbled on the article, he most probably though it was not notable enough for the encyclopedia and nominated it for deletion. A lot of us have one time or the other have our articles deleted before too, it's no big deal. I see you're a studdnt of KWASU, why don't you come around and write something about your vice chancellor or previous ones, nobody can nominate them for deletion because they're are inherently noytable. You can also help improve the Wikpedia article about your school, it would be highly appreciated. You can see a lot about notability here. You may also want to see this when next you intend to create an atricle, it contains helpful tips you could use. Also please come around here where some really helpful guy will help you with whatever problem you might be faceing concerning the Wiki. So Kolapoimam don't go, just not yet!!! Feel free to drop a note on my talkpage if you have any issues or questions (I might be slow to respond, apologies in advance). See you around if you decide to come back! Regards,

Mahveotm (talk) 18:25, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks For Checking On Me

Hi Mahveotm,

I understand how Wikipedia works and I'm just trying to contribute but I realized is that most of you guys don't use your original identity which makes it easier in my own case for other users to find out more about me and attack me. I had done editing on KWASU page in the past, even in 2018, I also updates some high profile pages as well and it's been cool but the fact that some users keep saying something about interest or me getting paid for creating an article is sad and I don't like such.

Thanks for reaching out.

AfC notification: Draft:Mustapha Lukman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mustapha Lukman. Thanks! KJP1 (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Demola Adetona has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Demola Adetona. Thanks! KJP1 (talk) 19:14, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rev. Prof. Daddy Hezekiah.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rev. Prof. Daddy Hezekiah.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. KJP1 (talk) 07:44, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note I have contested your attempt to have this file uploaded to Commons. I can only assume you intend to use it as part of another effort to get an article about the pastor on Wikipedia. KJP1 (talk) 07:44, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aderounmu Adejumoke

Hi, if you want to add content, you need reliable sources. KJP1 (talk) 09:13, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Divine Symphony Orchestra (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AmericanAir88 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Divine Symphony Orchestra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Divine Symphony Orchestra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AmericanAir88 (talk) 18:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Behmor. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:50, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Thanks so much Man I really appreciate.

Speedy deletion nomination of Behmor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Behmor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:51, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Behmor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Behmor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behmor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Behmor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Divine Symphony Orchestra (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Newslinger was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The links in the "External links" section are broken. please take some time to read through Help:Referencing for beginners and fix your references. Thanks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Divine Symphony Orchestra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Divine Symphony Orchestra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Newslinger talk 01:48, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fisayo Fosudo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fisayo Fosudo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fisayo Fosudo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 22:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Adetola Nola

Hello, Kolapoimam,

Thank you for creating Adetola Nola.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article needs more citations to independent coverage of the subject (i.e. not interviews)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:36, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Campustrybe.com

Hi Kolapoimam
Please refrained from adding your website to Wikipedia articles. If you continue to do this, I'm afraid I'll report you to administrators. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 13:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pamilerin Adegoke (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pamilerin Adegoke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pamilerin Adegoke, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 08:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello how are you barcelona_kid 18:02, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 06:04, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See especially WP:ENGVAR--British-English is not the only "correct" way, and is sometimes even incorrect in certain contexts. DMacks (talk) 06:17, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kolapoimam. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 21:15, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock| I've been off Wikipedia for some while cos I have other important things to attend to not until I received this email. The last page I worked on were random from the suggested article page and my edits were simple English related and someone cautioned me that British English is not the only correct version for Wikipedia. Ever since then, I stopped editing again. A certain user submitted me for Suck puppetry with another user I don't even know exists, it was unconfirmed but you went ahead and tag other two accounts that are related to it. If you have a proof of paid editing from my account why not paste it here. Most of you can't even use your real name but here I am putting myself out there cos I've got nothing to hide. The paste page I worked on for a Nigerian Sustainable business founder was a draft article I submitted for review, I didn't publish myself just cos I want other editors to look into it and may be offer some advise on what to improve on. If I can do it, I will and if not, I'll let go}

It's very simple, just look at your Upwork profile. Please note, they have one more account, possibly WP:MEAT and I have shared the details with Doc James, Yunshui and the blocking admin. GSS ^💬 07:09, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kolapoimam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you're being fair with your dealing, you should know this are not even linked and I rather see this as hatred against my personality. I joined Upwork in January and there's no link whatsoever with my Upwork profiles and these pages. The last major edits I made on Wikipedia were in 2019 and ever since it has been through AFD if at all I want to edit a page. This is not how to use your Admin right and I hope you do better.

Decline reason:

I have verified that it is not true that your last major edits were in 2019. For example, all of your edits to Jennifer Uchendu were marked as major and indicated significant contributions, and these occurred in 2020. You made a number of edits to other articles, too, all of which are marked as major but admittedly, most of which are actually minor. Yamla (talk) 13:29, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kolapoimam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The edits I made for Jennifer Uchendu was through AFD and I didn't publish it myself due to warnings by other Admin in the past. I only submitted it for review, if it get published fine and if not that's fine. The edits I made were all grammatical and were reversed by another use who claimed British English is not the only acceptable structure on Wikipedia. Looks like its beyond Wiki but it's fine

Decline reason:

Does not deal with the issue at hand which is undisclosed paid editing / socking. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:13, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Draft:Pamilerin Adegoke concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pamilerin Adegoke, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pamilerin Adegoke

Hello, Kolapoimam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pamilerin Adegoke".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 17:45, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adetola Nola

The article Adetola Nola has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Clear failure to meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FalconK (talk) 00:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kalada Belema Meshack-Hart

The article Kalada Belema Meshack-Hart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article with no clear evidence he meets WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO, created by a WP:UPE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FalconK (talk) 00:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jennifer Uchendu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jennifer Uchendu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Uchendu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 17:29, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]