User talk:L3erdnik

Welcome!

Hello, L3erdnik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 18:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quetelet Rings has been accepted

Quetelet Rings, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Quetelet rings

Hello, L3erdnik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Quetelet rings".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 18:46, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vietoris–Begle mapping theorem

Could you please check where your links are going? I have just repaired Vietoris–Begle mapping theorem where you added a link to a disambiguation page. While you were claiming to "Fixed the misleading short hand", the truth is that you in fact linked to nothing. The Banner talk 18:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to make it clear that the theorem is not for singular homology (which would be kind of a default assumption). I intended to create a stub on Vietoris homology, haven't got to it trying to figure out is it that different from a better known Steenrod homology. That was definitely not a good planning decision from me. Would it be ok if in the disputed place it will say "reduced Vietoris homology" to warn people and lead to the same place it does now (generic reduced homology)? L3erdnik (talk) 18:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be true, I am solely concerned about links to disambiguation pages as that is the project I am working on. The Banner talk 19:28, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, then I'll keep the destination for the link and just adjust the wording. L3erdnik (talk) 19:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on gravitational redshift.

Thanks, I agree with your revert, I almost did not copy the content. But there is no reason to be nasty. Critical comments always come across harsh, so a bit of nice thrown in will go a long way. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:29, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to keep that in mind more. I was just trying to emphasize why in my opinion that segment should not be in the article, so I highlighted the problematic aspects. L3erdnik (talk) 15:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]