User talk:Lartoven/Archives/April 2009
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| Userpage | Talk page | Awards | Sandbox | Sandbox 2 | Article Drafts |
| Messages left here will be replied to here unless otherwise noted. If I left something on your talk page, please reply there. Thanks! --Calvin |
 | This talk page is automatically archived by ClueBot III. Any sections older than 168 hours are automatically archived. An archive index is available here. --Calvin 1998 (t-c) |
I thought you'd be interested in this.
[edit]You're famous, my good friend!
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=calvin_1998
Much Love, Aslan 1212 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.66.93.134 (talk) 19:38, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost, 20 April 2009
[edit]- Book reviews: Reviews of The Wikipedia Revolution
- Wikipedia by numbers: Wikipedia's coverage and conflicts quantified
- News and notes: New program officer, survey results, and more
- Dispatches: Valued pictures
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Film
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Unjustified blanking
[edit]Why did you blank every user in Wikipedia:Huggle/Users? Please provide a significant reason in the edit summary next time. -Porchcrop (talk|contributions) 02:52, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- My reasoning is a bit long, so I didn't provide it in the edit summary. But since you asked, here it is: (1) The list is meant to show who uses huggle (2) Inactive users stay on the list, cluttering it up and making it unclear who is actually using it (3) Manually removing inactive users is tedious and unnecessary because (4) The list automatically refills itself quickly anyway, as you saw, as soon as someone uses huggle, their name is added to the list. Calvin 1998 (t·c) 03:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. You did the right thing. Thank you. :) -Porchcrop (talk|contributions) 03:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)