User talk:Lew 283

Your edits

Before changing an infobox image on any article, please gain a talk page consensus. DDMS123 (talk) 18:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand why can’t you change a picture as that picture as that was the original 2A02:C7C:98D2:7F00:48C3:81EB:9E12:5C05 (talk) 19:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You still need a talk page consensus. DDMS123 (talk) 01:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get it people just edit, so why are you going around editing my stuff Lew 283 (talk) 08:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since changing images may disrupt consistency between other articles, you'll need a talk page consensus. Infobox images have always required a talk page consensus. Please see WP:CONSENSUS and WP:BRD. DDMS123 (talk) 18:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charles I

I’ve changed the main inbox image to the original portrait of Charles I that was previously there Lew 283 (talk) 19:15, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:CONSENSUS and WP:BRD before making future edits. DDMS123 (talk) 01:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Change Charles I inbox image

I want to change the image,as current is a copy of the original and original is a nicer change Lew 283 (talk) 08:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Elisabeth of France (1602–1644). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please see MOS:PORTRAIT where it states "It is often preferable to place a portrait (image or representation of a person) so that they "look" toward the text, but do not achieve this by reversing the image, which creates a false presentation. (Faces are never truly symmetric even in the absence of scars or other features.)". DDMS123 (talk) 18:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Princess Mary, Duchess of Gloucester and Edinburgh, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please see MOS:PORTRAIT. DDMS123 (talk) 18:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What was disruptive or inappropriate about the picture of Princess Mary Lew 283 (talk) 18:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of style violations as the portrait added violates MOS:PORTRAIT. I suggest reading the full warning. DDMS123 (talk) 19:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Coronation of Mary I of England

You have made a mistake it says a groat on the images details and I know it's a groat by looking at it and I am a coin collector as it happens Lew 283 (talk) 19:54, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I didn't read it correctly. I fixed the disambiguated link so that it actually links to the article about the coin. DDMS123 (talk) 20:47, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]