User talk:Lex Luthor16

February 2017

Welcome!

Hello, Lex Luthor16, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to continue. Some useful pages to visit are:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! 7&6=thirteen (☎)

March 2017

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Blade Runner, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 12:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at No Country for Old Men (film), you may be blocked from editing. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 12:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, X-Men: First Class, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 14:57, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Fate of the Furious

You added a reference about the film's genre by citing IMDb. Just change it to The Hollywood Reporter piece that you mentioned in the hidden note as Wikipedia frowns on citing IMDb as reference as per WP:CITEIMDB. Cheers. Blue sphere 04:36, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Furious 7 and The Fate of the Furious. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 08:50, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at 2001: A Space Odyssey (film), you may be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 13:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Shawshank Redemption

Would you care to explain this edit at The Shawshank Redemption? The link you added was not properly formatted and did not corroborate the claim. I appreciate the WSJ article is behind a paywall and it would be helpful if it could be replaced by one that is not, but the source you added in its place was pointless because it does not back up the figure in the article. Betty Logan (talk) 19:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Fate of the Furious. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 14:15, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Iron Man (2008 film) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 13:23, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Minority Report (film), you may be blocked from editing. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 12:34, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:58, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Please stop adding your own personal analysis to film leads, such as labeling whether a film received positive reviews or was a box office bomb. This needs to be properly sourced; you can't simply look at an aggregator or the grosses and make the decision yourself. This is known as original research, and it is forbidden on Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lex Luthor16. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]