User talk:LimosaCorel

Welcome!

Hello, LimosaCorel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Cofradia de la Inmaculada Concepcion. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rarkenin (talk) 03:03, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Per WP:BURDEN, now that I have challenged your inclusion of Roman Catholic in Kim Kardashian, you cannot restore it without an inline citation to a reliable source that supports the statement. "I watched it on TV" in an edit summary is not sufficient sourcing for any statement in a biography, much less one that has been challenged.—Kww(talk) 19:55, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Our Mother of Sheshan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Chinese, Madonna and American Chinese

Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tilma

Ignacia del Espíritu Santo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mother Superior

Our Lady of Atonement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Madonna

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sheshan Basilica

Hello, I would like to ask about several edits you made recently to Sheshan Basilica, it would be helpful if you could explain what you meant. As English does not seem to be your first language, I would be happy to help you rephrase this content in a way which is more understandable to most readers.

1. Since the Cultural Revolution, the national shrine is the first historical basilica in Eastern Asia: In particular, what did you mean by "is the first historical basilica"? Is "first historical basilica" a technical term? If not, then the sentence does not seem to make sense.

2. along with the recently constructed image of Our Mother of Sheshan: What is meant by "constructed" here? Is this referring to a physical image that was physically constructed? Or are you arguing that "Our Mother of Sheshan" is a recent creation? How "recent" is this "construction"?

Also, your claim that (if I understand it correctly) "Our Lady of Zose/Sheshan" is not the traditional dedication of the church is sourced to an image (which does not prove anything one way or the other) and to a footnote which does not contain any sources. You will need a better source than that if you are contending a view which seems inconsistent with the words of the Pope. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 11:07, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prophecy of the Popes

The text you keep adding to Prophecy of the Popes regarding the position of the Church is unsupported by reliable sources and is original research. Please use the talk page to build consensus rather than continually re-adding the challenged material to the article.--Trystan (talk) 04:01, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Hello, I'm Aunva6. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pope Benedict XVI, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Youtube is generally not an acceptable source. articles covered by WP:BLP are especially stringent about sourcing. plean find another, better source for it Aunva6 (talk) 07:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prophecy of the Popes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cashel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion

Hello, LimosaCorel. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Prophecy of the Popes. Thank you. --Trystan (talk) 04:26, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roman Catholicism in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:42, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Pope Francis does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Elizium23 (talk) 20:59, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pope Francis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shrine of Our Lady of Bonaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devotee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Roman Catholic theology may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

and Valerie Hotchkiss, editors. ''Creeds and Confessions of Faith in the Christian Tradition]''. Yale University Press 2003 ISBN 0-300-09389-6.</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roman Catholic theology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holy Rosary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring in Roman Catholic theology

I can guess that you might be annoyed that I reverted some of your recent changes (none of which were explained in edit summaries or elsewhere). I like some of your edits to the page, but I disagree with others. Now you have restored your original version, again without any explanation. Since Wikipedia works by consensus, I would like to invite you to explain your proposed changes on the talk page. -Hugetim ^(talk) 23:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Homosexuality and Roman Catholicism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holy Matrimony (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Pagan religions, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Ian.thomson. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Pagan religions. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NEVER write anything like "Fuck off my Pagan you bareback mancunt pig slut." on any page again

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Dougweller (talk) 09:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Second Vatican Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apostolic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Novena to Our Mother of Perpetual Help, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baclaran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm John Cline. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Lent because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. you are in violation of Wikipedia police: WP:3RR! Immediately cease with the back and forth reverts and discuss your differences on the article's talk page. —John Cline (talk) 02:58, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No its fine, you did the right thing. The other person, Anglican? wants to present a thesis that Lenten customs are not rooted in the Catholic tradition, and that their religion did not inherit as such---which is ahistorical and revisionistic. Thanks LimosaCorel (talk) 04:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LimosaCorel, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 04:25, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Massive edit war and possible socking regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 04:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will go further and say that you are involved; and you should hope to provide a good answer – soon – because I am nearly convinced that you were not unaware of your own misconduct.—John Cline (talk) 05:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Holy Week, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for three days

You have been blocked from editing for a period of three days for edit warring and editing while logged out to avoid scrutiny on Lent. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LimosaCorel, as you did at Lent. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Friday of Sorrows (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Passion

Virgin of Hope of Macarena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Santero

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teresa of Ávila, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Gaga

Hello, regarding your edits to Lady Gaga, while "Roman Catholic" is in fact a religious affiliation, the standard is to list one's religious affiliation in the noun from (Catholicism) rather than adjective (Catholic). Also, "Roman Catholic" and "Roman Catholicism" are redirects, which should be avoided. Thank you. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 19:28, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Pope Francis. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 23:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Pope Francis, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 23:07, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Defrocking, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Elizium23 (talk) 00:44, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Pope Francis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Elizium23 (talk) 01:37, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Pope Francis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Elizium23 (talk) 01:40, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Pope Francis in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 01:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patronages of the Immaculate Conception, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, LimosaCorel. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mary Jean Lastimosa, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 00:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Lloydbaltazar (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]