[[//]] /archive

If you came here pissed off with my edits

This is a quote from my answer to one angry post. I think it may serve as a general disclaimer. Lorem Ip (talk) 17:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't expect myself to engage in any controversies. If you care to check my edit history, I don't have any particular area of fanatic interest. I am just reading wikipedia for my own education. If I think something requires intervention, I edit it. Sometimes it goes OK. Other times I hit a hornet's nest. Big deal. I understand your concern that I am a potential troublemaker. Well, I will try not to be.

Civility evidence

FYI, the evidence stage closed some time ago. You should possibly consider self reverting this, I imagine a clerk may come around at some point and remove it anyways. Steven Zhang ^{Join the DR army!} 21:42, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto.... Sorry to hear about your bad experiences, and I'm glad that you decided to continue editing! :)

Cheers, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 21:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]