User talk:Lukemendes

Lukemendes (talk) 15:15, 31 January 2011 (UTC) ==Dog Eat Dog (film)== A tag has been placed on Dog Eat Dog (film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.[reply]

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 172.148.249.21 18:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PressKit.pdf listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:PressKit.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Hut 8.5 06:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Luke Mendes. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Falcon8765 (talk) 04:47, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Mumbai appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 14:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Mumbai‎, you may be blocked from editing. —Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 16:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Luke Mendes for deletion

The article Luke Mendes is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Mendes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Worm 14:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

If your argument is about your edits getting reverted, remember that every other edit of yours is being reverted ([1], [2] and others that I reverted) by some or the other. You are clearly vandalising pages by adding orginal research. So please look at your own back! If you continue posting nonsense on my talk page, I'll report to a blocking admin.—Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 12:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm Batternut. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mumbai have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Batternut (talk) 12:02, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]