User talk:Mørken
Hi, Mørken, this is to follow up on the "availability" section on this article. If the link you provided the only official download site for the game, then yes we should add it to the external links section of the article (WP:VG/EL). However, it appears to be available from the official site ([1]). If the distribution through Pirate Bay is of particular note, then as normal this needs to be shown through secondary sources (WP:V). I hope this clarifies!
One issue the article has is that it doesn't show how the game is notable. Let me know if you can help in this regard. The only coverage I can find is one uncritical review on RPGFan.com. Marasmusine (talk) 08:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Mørken, I'm just looking through the links you provided. I think in particular reviews by amature writers tend to be uncritical, which is why we need to make sure that anything we cite is a reliable source. I am undecided about RPGFan: it has a large editorial team, but is still self-published, and might be worth querying at the RS talk page or the gaming wikiproject.
Some of the links you provided would not be usable - but Gamezebo, Gametunnel are both acceptable, and I think Jayisgames and gamertell have been used before, too. These four reviews also provide some criticism and I think will be valuable to the article. In fact, once they are cited, I think we can go ahead and remove the "notability" warning.
Thanks for finding these. I'll put the article on my "to do" list. Marasmusine (talk) 08:53, 31 July 2010 (UTC)