User talk:M.Naff

Donkey Punch (Robot Chicken episode)

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Donkey Punch (Robot Chicken episode), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. D0ggieM0mma 21:22, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I propose we delete that Prod and your account. All the information was there, I know because a friend from Youtube gave me the video and you watchdogs are just here to make trouble.

Little context in Flea bitten Ed

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Flea bitten Ed, by ZxqamF (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Flea bitten Ed is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Flea bitten Ed, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Flea bitten Ed itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop adding fancruft to the Ed, Edd n Eddy articles. You keep adding bad information about Eddy's ID card. It is "Ratfink Avenue" which means that it's a joke and not to be taken seriously. Eddy had one of those fake ID cards that you fill out yourself. This has been discussed on the talk pages long ago. Thank you. -- Elaich ^talk 04:28, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll stop if you can write down the names of the people who wrote, directed and storyboarded the episodes that is the only thing we don't have.

Re: Damn User

I suggest you take a look at Wikipedia:Notability (books). If you believe that Jacob's Ladder(Novel) is notable, you should add some indication of the importance of that book. Rl 12:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the book is very good, so I think it should be noticed

I have no reason to doubt that the book is good, and I don't particularly care if it gets deleted or not. Wikipedia guidelines say to include books only after they have become notable, no matter what we personally think of them, and your own experience here will be more pleasant if you learn the ropes quickly. That also includes looking at other, similar articles and realizing that the naming scheme is "name (novel)", not "name(Novel)", or what categories are typically used with such articles. – And by the way, please sign your comments with ~~~~ which produces the kind of signature you see at the end of other people's comments. Rl 06:22, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that was an accident with the name, but don't blame me, I had another account, so I thought I knew the ropes before I came here. This is the problem with wikipedia, you have you'r articles deleted and movies have smaller importance then this book.

The article Countdown (Short Film) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MastCell ^Talk 21:28, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Marcel Kyrill Gardelli has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MastCell ^Talk 21:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Interrupted (film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Crystal ballery - WP:CRYSTAL

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 16:33, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beast of Bataan

If I could have a moment of your time, I'd like to inform you about the notability guidelines for films. The guidelines say, "Films which have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced shooting should not have their own articles. Until then discussion of the film may be included in articles about the film's subject material. Sources need to confirm the start of shooting after shooting has begun." The article Beast of Bataan has not begun shooting yet, so it's not yet appropriate for the article to exist. I would suggest redirecting this to under Bataan Death March or Masaharu Homma until there can be verification that the film has entered production. (See Spider-Man 4 as an example of a merge.) A lot of projects in development will not end up in production, and it may be the case for this film. If you need help merging, let me know! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 15:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen that happen before, I'll tell you what, I'll merge it, but can we come to an agreement as well?

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sausage Fest

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sausage Fest, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Garchy (talk) 05:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jess Manafort for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jess Manafort is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jess Manafort until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MelanieN (talk) 08:44, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]