User talk:M7aub

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:HilalAouam per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HilalAouam. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 04:17, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

M7aub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, thank you for your messages, I believe that you make a mistake of blocking me, I'm not User:HilalAouam, I just created an article that this person tries to create before which is Muneer Lyati, because this person Muneer asked me to create an article for him. Also I don't know why you delete an old article that I did Rayquan Smith. I need you to look again for you decision and if you want anything to show you that I'm not this person User:HilalAouam I will show them to you. M7aub (talk) 13:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, meaning that it is supported with technical evidence, so sockpuppetry is not in doubt. If you are not a sock, you will need to give a plausible explanation as to why technical evidence would indicate otherwise. 331dot (talk) 19:47, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

M7aub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I told you before, I was hired to create an article about Muneer Lyati who is already did by another user who is User:HilalAouam, and I didn't know that until I noticed that this article has been speedly deleted. That's why I asked you to review your decision as I'm not a sock, and I want you please to remove the deletion on the first article that I did Rayquan Smith M7aub (talk) 08:48, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Admitting that you've been violating WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, and the terms of use is even more of a reason to leave you blocked. Frankly, if you were hired to create an article, that makes you a sockpuppet. Yamla (talk) 09:43, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.