User talk:Maggiejhan

Help me!

Hi I am still waiting someone can advise for what reason the article been deleted 2 days agao, so i can improve it. Thanks!

Hi, can anyone advise why this page been deleted? how should we improve it? thanks.

Maggiejhan (talk) 20:44, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

You have already asked this question at multiple places. See User_talk:Josve05a#Untitled_.282013-03-16.29. Mkdw^talk 21:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

(edit conflict)There are multiple issues here. First of all, who is "we"? Wikipedia does not allow the shared use of accounts; only one person should ever have access to a given account.

Secondly, the page you turned into an article on Master Lu was a disambiguation page that listed various possible meanings of the term "Master Lu", including one of the Twelve Philosophers known as "Master Lu". I do not think the person you're writing about is so much more notable than all the others combined that it's appropriate to turn that person into the primary topic, making all others more difficult to find. A more appropriate solution would be to add some disambiguating qualifier to your subject, say Master Lu (Australia) or whatever qualifier seems most appropriate to distinguish this Master Lu from the others.

Thirdly, the article did not cite any reliable sources at all. For example, "Master Lu’s website reached 30 million visitors" and "Guan Yin Citta has a significant global impact" - says who, except themselves? This lack of sources simply is not acceptable for the biography of a living person (and it would be a major defect for any other article too). What we're looking for are sources that are subject to editorial oversight, with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy, such as articles in newspapers or reputable magazines. The Wikipedia article should be a summary (in your own words) of what such third-party sources report about Master Lu. In fact, the very same deficiencies are the reason Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Master Lu was declined twice, without any improvement. It appears no third-party sources discuss Master Lu in any detail, which would mean that by Wikipedia's standards he is not considered notable enough for an article at all. Huon (talk) 21:28, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Help me!

Hi, Can anyone advise my question. I revised the article as per the requirment and put all relative reference as well. It still been deleted. Pls advise where is going wrong? thanks.

Maggiejhan (talk) 21:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

The article was unduly promotional (ie spam) and the sources you cited were anything but reliable. Just to give you a random example, File:Hongkong2012.jpg does not at all confirm that the "Dharma Convention in Hong Kong attracted many people to attend" - firstly, "many" is uselessly vague anyway, secondly, there's no indication that the image even depicts the Dharma Convention in Hong Kong. Wikipedia content should be based on reliable published sources such as newspaper articles about the subject. You may want to take a look at WP:Identifying reliable sources and WP:BIO, our notability guideline for biographies. On an unrelated note, unless you personally wrote the newspaper you uploaded here, that's not your own work and is copyrighted. Huon (talk) 23:27, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Provide information in the article

Hi. Please provide information in the article - do not link to outside pages. You can - and must - use outside sources as references, but not with links to these in the article, these links appear at the end of the article in the references section. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 20:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jun Hong Lu

The article Jun Hong Lu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability: while the page has been flooded with cites, they were self-published, paid or otherwise highly unreliable (word press pages, "Danish royal news" inexplicably located in Hong Kong). It remains an orphan and I have been able to find little *information* on Jun Hong Lu on the web that is *not* self-published. Even these pages don't give information about Jun, they just mention his name and that he's a superior spiritual master.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ogress _smash! 21:49, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jun Hong Lu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jun Hong Lu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jun Hong Lu (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 14:54, 19 June 2016 (UTC)