User talk:Mahamagadh

June 2019

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mikhael (film)‎ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 18:55, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19 June 2019

Hello Arjayay. Have reviewed the plot length on wiki help page shared by you. re-paragraphed the earlier plot. But Critical reception section been poorly cited, for some even Facebook report been cited. All four tags I added back, Request you to remove the ref flag after review.

Hello WhisperToMe, request your review.

Discussion created on User talk:WhisperToMe page

Hello Arjayay, please take your time to review the discussion created on this talk page. Thank You (Mahamagadh (talk) 19:59, 18 June 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Concord Biotech has been accepted

Concord Biotech, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 23:16, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You User:CAPTAIN MEDUSA. (Mahamagadh (talk) 02:02, 22 June 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Hasty editing

Re: this edit, in your haste to scrub the {{refimprove}} and {{copyedit}} templates from the article, you also erroneously removed {{Use dmy dates}} and {{Use Indian English}}. Don't remove templates if you don't know what purpose they serve. We also do not use IMDB as a reference per WP:UGC, and we do not turn plot sections into skeletons. Plot sections should describe the entire movie from beginning to end. See WP:SPOILER. It also appears that you stuffed a 2.5/5 star review at the top of the Critical reception section and removed other negative reviews. This doesn't appear constructive. I'd strongly advise you to make better editing choices going forward, and if you are engaged in any sort of promotional or public relations management, be advised that it will not be tolerated. Also, per WP:PAID, if you are a paid editor, you are required to disclose this fact, along with the name of your employer, client, and any other relevant information. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:33, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]