User talk:Mahmoud W. 2001

Welcome!

Hi Mahmoud W. 2001! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 00:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Best Practice of Technology Commercialisation Programs at GCC and USA Universities (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Wgullyn were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Current sources -- 1. Goodreads (user-generated content) 2. Amazon (self-published). Needs more reliable and independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Best Practice of Technology Commercialisation Programs at GCC and USA Universities and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Best Practice of Technology Commercialisation Programs at GCC and USA Universities, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>>> Wgullyn.talk(); 23:53, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mahmoud W. 2001! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! >>> Wgullyn.talk(); 23:53, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Best Practice of Technology Commercialisation Programs at GCC and USA Universities moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Best Practice of Technology Commercialisation Programs at GCC and USA Universities, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 23:03, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Hameed al-Ghabin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Abdul Hameed al-Ghabin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 12:04, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello Mahmoud W. 2001. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mahmoud W. 2001. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mahmoud W. 2001|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. BilledMammal (talk) 10:33, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User:BilledMammal.

Firstly, Thanks for your efforts. In fact, I did not work on Wikipedia for a fee (Paid), and I will not work, My work on Wikipedia comes within the framework of amending the pages related to human rights. I do not work to promote a specific organization in its favor, but rather add several sources for reliable and active organizations in the field of human rights. Through my edits, I aim to promote human rights and document the rights of victims on Wikipedia.

My edits, such as the one you made to Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor, are not Piad, I just wanted to document the achievements of human rights. Mahmoud W. 2001 (talk) 10:48, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia requires third party sources. Please stop adding material sourced to the article subject. Thank you.Selfstudier (talk) 10:57, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,thank you. Mahmoud W. 2001 (talk) 10:59, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Azhar Kubba moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Azhar Kubba, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 19:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Best Practice of Technology Commercialisation Programs at GCC and USA Universities

Hello, Mahmoud W. 2001. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Best Practice of Technology Commercialisation Programs at GCC and USA Universities, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Nawaf Al-Jamea

Hello, Mahmoud W. 2001, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Paul W, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Nawaf Al-Jamea, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nawaf Al-Jamea.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Paul W}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Paul W (talk) 14:44, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have deleted the advertising content and the company name that was mentioned, and all existing sources from different news and newspapers.

Mahmoud W. 2001 (talk) 11:23, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nawaf Al-Jamea for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nawaf Al-Jamea, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nawaf Al-Jamea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have deleted the advertising content and the company name that was mentioned, and all existing sources from different news and newspapers.

Mahmoud W. 2001 (talk) 11:22, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Best Practice of Technology Commercialisation Programs at GCC and USA Universities 2

Hello, Mahmoud W. 2001. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Best Practice of Technology Commercialisation Programs at GCC and USA Universities 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Best Practice of Technology Commercialisation Programs at GCC and USA Universities 2

Hello, Mahmoud W. 2001. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Best Practice of Technology Commercialisation Programs at GCC and USA Universities 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:09, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MiApple Inc.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MiApple Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kleuske (talk) 14:36, 12 September 2022 (UTC) read the guidance below:[reply]

Biographies

When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:09, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I will and apply your advice, Thanks. Mahmoud W. 2001 (talk) 20:24, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MiApple Inc

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MiApple Inc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ‡ Night Watch ω (talk) 20:03, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of We Are Not Numbers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article We Are Not Numbers, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Are Not Numbers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]