This is the eleventh page of my talkpage archives, dated mid-March to early April 2006. Please do not edit this page. If you wish to leave a message, click here! :)
One day i'll have back my honor that was stolen from me, and if I can gain it back little by little through jokes, all the better :-)
KarmafistSave Wikipedia 16:51, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi Mailer, I really thank you for having confidence in me and nominating me for my withdrawn RFA. This is the reason as I felt that I lack the experience and would like to go under admin coaching first before I go for another RFA. I hope you will still have confidence in me after this RFA and I've already contacted Titoxd about this, and I will get a coach by Monday. NSLE has already agreed to be my admin coach. I apologise for nominating me. Sorry :( --Terence Ong 05:40, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
There is a persistant troll named Meade Skelton who has yet again recreated false information in the Wikipedia database. The information on him was considered for review and after a period of consideration the web page was cancelled due to lack of notability as per Wikipedia standards. As this person continues to recreate the information the web page had the discussion tab removed, with a warning that the information was not to be retsored without Wikipedia approval. There is an article that is listed currently for deletion here:
Thanks for your recent support on my RfA which passed 91/0/0. If you ever need anything, feel free to leave me a message! GfloresTalk 05:51, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
This is complete B.S. Meade Skelton is a great musician. Whats the deal with not allowing his page here? It seems that Wikipedia is more of a Dictatorship than anything else. The deletions were because of vandalisms which had nothing to do with subject at hand. People were vandalizing his entry. Meade Skelton is listed on
BiggestStars.Com Plus, other music guides as well. His deletion was unnecessary and petty.
Meade Skelton is a troll.
Meade Skeleton continues to enter data on various websites such as Biggest star that allow user input. These are not seperate and independent sources of information. Whether or not Meade Skelton is a musician he has done nothing of signifigance to warrant inclusion in Wikipedia. If someone merely has to repeatedly post comments about themself to warrant inclusion then anyone could have their own Wikipedia page. [Baronvon]
Greetings from an Indian wikipedian. I saw you on this page, and just felt like saying you a hello. Let us sometimes exchange our wiki-experience to build the best global encyclopedia. --Bhadani 07:46, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
People like you? I don't think there's anyone quite like you when it comes to AFD-caretaking; so please don't be so... misleading. ;) Seriously, I truly respect your work. Cheers. PJM 19:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
I don't know why you deleted Off the Crossbar, because it is a valid article about a new book. Please restore the original article, and tell me why you deleted it. Thanks, Theonlyedge 21:52, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi Mailer! Thank you, of course, for supporting my RfA. It passed at 105/1/0, putting me in WP:100 - I'm delighted and surprised! I'm always happy to help out, so if you need anything, please drop me a line. Cheers! ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 19:58, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
The Adventure House, whose AfD you closed on March 2, has been recreated. I have marked it for speedy deletion as a recreation of deleted material. Would you please be so kind as to speedy this article? SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:27, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
I have uploaded, and propose supporting the original, unmodified scan - historical significance. If you agree, please feel free to re-consider your vote. Greetings, --Janke | Talk 14:36, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi -- you closed this AfD debate but didn't actually delete the article. I figure you forgot, so I figured I'd mention it. :) Mangojuice 18:25, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting / opposing / vandalisingmy RFA! The result was 71/3/0 and so I am now still a normal user / an administrator / indefinitely banned. Your constructive criticism / support / foulmouthed abuse has given me something to think about / helped me immensely / turned me into a nervous wreck. If there's any way I can help you in return, please ask someone else / suffer and die / drop me a line! --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian)(talk) 19:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Dear Mr Blanning, thank you for choosing the ACME Auto-thanker! Simply strike out the phrases that do not apply and tear off this strip at the indicated line to give all your supporters and detractors the personalised response they so richly deserve. N.B: DO NOT FORGET TO TEAR THIS BIT OFF, MORON!
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phone Losers of America (Second nomination)
I convey my greetings to you on my completion of one year as a wikipedian. Come here, we shall have a party tonight. The biggest laddus have been ordered. --Bhadani 15:27, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for voting on my RfA. It passed with a consensus to promote of 45/7/1. To those of you concerned about the fact that I am a relative newcomer, I encourage you to poke me with a sharp stick if I make a mistake. Or better yet, let me know on my talk page, and I'll do my best to fix it. Nice user page by the way. Makemi 05:03, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I tried looking for a wikipedia policy on what and what not to include under "see also" but couldn't find any substantial info. Can you point me in the right direction? --Dodo bird 18:04, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Thank you so much for supporting me in my recent RfA, which passed with a final tally of 56/1/0. I thank you for your confidence in my abilities. If you ever need anything or find that I have made an error, please let me know on my talk page. — Scm83xhook 'em 21:21, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi Mailer diablo, and thank you for taking time to vote on my RfA. I understand that my last 6000+ edits were not sufficient to convince you that edits like some of my early ones would never be repeated again, but I sincerely hope that at some point I would be able to convince you of my transformation. Looking forward to working with you in future. Regards, deeptrivia (talk) 03:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Mailer diablo, your reply to Deeptrivia - yes, he is a rare gem here, and time shall prove this... --Bhadani 05:56, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
By the way, my greetings to all those who voted an oppose to my nomination may be perhaps first time in the history of wikipedia. I am not sure though. --Bhadani 05:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
I like this template a lot, and have been realising I need a custom welcome template, would you be OK with me cribbing it? Thanks... (and please reply here. I find it quite scattery to not keep threads in the same place...) ++Lar: t/c 09:18, 26 March 2006 (UTC) PS what part of S'pore are you staying in? I was there for a month in 2005, staying on Orchard Road and working near Kranji... i thought it was pretty neat.
Sure, feel free to use it (copy it to your userpage and modify it to suit your needs if you like)! The SGpedians' noticeboard should well give a clue about your question. :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 12:04, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. BTW, I'm rather pleased at how this article came out... The Observatory (band)++Lar: t/c 14:00, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Reach out is a program aimed at allowing users to bring issues that they have had in Wikipedia to a listening, sympathetic and caring audience:
"No one can know how we feel if we do not say. We cannot expect to get understanding if we do not ask for it. No one will dispute that sometimes life's issues are too much for one person. It is fair to say that sometimes Wikipedia's problems fall under the same heading. This is a place where you can bring the bruises that can sometimes be got on this project for attention."
The Stress alertsprogram aims at identifying users who are stressed, alerting the community of thier stress and works in tandem with the Stressbusters at trying to identify causes of stress and eliminating them.
Note from the editor
Welcome to this new format of the Esperanza Newsletter, which came about during the last Advisory Council meeting - we hope you like it! The major changes are that each month, right after the Council meeting, this will be sent out and will include two featured programs and a sum up of the meeting. Also, it will be signed by all of the Advisory Council members, not just Celestianpower. Have an Esperanzial end of March, everyone!
My RfA recently closed and it was a success, passing at 84-02-00. I would like to thank you for taking the time to weigh in and on your subsequent support. And I know it's quite cliche, but if you ever need any assistance and/or want another opinion on something, grab a Pepsi and don't hesitate to drop me a line on my talk page. Thanks again. Pepsidrinka 04:44, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Mailer diablo/Archive K, thank you you so much for supporting my RfA, which passed successfully 49/6/3. I am grateful for all the supportive comments, and have taken people's suggestions to heart. I will do my best to live up to people's expectations. If I can ever make any improvements or help out in any way, please feel free to let me know! Thanks again for your much appreciated support.
Thank you for supporting/opposing/commenting on my request of adminship, sadly the result was 54/20/7 an thus only 73% support votes, resulting in that the nomination failed. As many of you commenting that I have to few main-space edits, I'll try to better my self on that part. If you have any ideas on what kind of articles I could edit, pleas send me a line. :)
Hey, quick question. How did you come to no consensus on that close? I know it kinda defaults to keep, but usually there's a bit more credibility behind a clear keep, and the hard totals on the AfD were 21 keep v. 9 delete/merge. So where does no consensus fit in, just so I'm clear? --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 02:02, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
I'm honestly not trying to be difficult, but I still don't get it... --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 02:20, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
I guess I'm wondering that too. Absent sock/meatpuppetry, that seems a consensus for keep. It looks like it got changed? That's even more confusing! The page now says keep... (I watch, please answer here) ++Lar: t/c 05:49, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Knowing a series used two logos and only one was listed in the Wiki page I am trying to add the second logo to the Wiki page. I got the picture uploaded and all that, but the edit page is confusing me seriously. NOt finding any help in the Image help section on such things as logo_image, doc_image, etc...
-Picture of the Doctor-
-Logo for Season 12 to 17-
-Caption that states it is the logo for Season 12 to 17-
-Logo for Season 18-
-Caption that states it is the logo for Season 18-
? I am not seeming to be figuring it out so far and it's bugging me. Help? Thanks!
We are talking perhaps after long gap. I just dropped in to wish you a nice and happy birth day. I know it is on 31st March, but I may not come here on that day due to heavy work load - I thought to come in advance - I would not miss the party, I will come some other day and we shall have fun. --Bhadani 15:27, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Let us build a "consensus on that" - hahahhahaha. BTW, now I know your birth day, so I will come from time to time to see the arrangments. --Bhadani 16:38, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Consensus reached - happy adminship anniverssary - you are senior to me, so I shall follow you around. All the best, and regards. --Bhadani 16:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I am obviously new at this but I was wondering if you could possibly reconsider my articles deletion. You see, as I stated at the bottom of the archive of the debate, the information comes to me by a verbal history. Is there still something that could be done to salvage this page? It is just such a tragic and beautiful tale that is a very fitting mythology for wikipedia. If you can, please let me know if there is any way I can proceed. Thank you – Jest R Wicked 04:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi Mailer, a Happy Admin promotion annivesary. You've done a great job in the past year with the mop. All the best for the upcoming times ahead. :) (P.S.: I would like if you could come to IRC tonight, provided you're free. But not too late though.) --Terence Ong 11:46, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Hello Mailer, a "Happy admin" "promotion" "anniversary" - all the best for all the coming years. --Bhadani 17:10, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
It's almost the end of the day, but happy admin promotion day! -- Natalya 23:49, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting my RfA. I’m proud to inform you that it passed with 75 support to 1 oppose to 2 neutral. I promise to make some great edits in the future (with edit summaries!) and use these powers to do all that I can to help. After all, that’s what I’m here for! (You didn’t think I could send a thank you note without a bad joke, could I?) --HereToHelp 12:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm wondering, are you aware how many of the keep votes were sockpuppets? JoshuaZ 02:45, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm curious as well what your count was for a no consensus? On the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of TRACS members I counted 4 keep votes (includes Itake) verses 15 delete votes. I mean these are obvious puppets[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]While admitted he voted in the Afd because he was told to Thus, those 10 votes discounted bring my tally to 4 keep votes verses 15 delete votes.
Also please let us know the user names of the discounted votes. Perhaps you can give it a closer look and see the comments by other users that were moved to the talk page.Arbusto 06:24, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
RCU may not be very useful in this case, since many of the users are very likely meatpuppets. If you look at the talk page this is discussed. JoshuaZ 15:14, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Also, thank you for spending time to look at this difficult AfD. JoshuaZ 18:14, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
A check user hasn't always worked with this suspected puppet. In fact, it is strongly believed that an anonimizer(s) is used to change and hide his IP. There are over a hundred puppets linked to Gastrich (see: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jason Gastrich/Evidence), which only a few were verified through check user. For example, User talk:Turkmen was not verified with check user results and denied being a sock. Yet, the account was blocked when this new user was making Gastrich style edits and added links to Gastrich's promotions(see that talk for proof). Meanwhile this User talk:Chuck Hastings sock puppet claimed he was not and did not know Gastrich. Yet, the email this sock puppet used was an account ran by Gastrich(see that talk for proof). Thanks for looking into this. Arbusto 20:44, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Funny thing. A new user with his fifth ever edit contacted my talk about lists[10]. Arbusto 21:11, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Another attack by a new user[11]. Arbusto 21:25, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I owe you an apology and an explanation, and I hope I haven't stuffed up the afd mechanism, but I rolled back your closure of this AFD. This particular huge batch afd is being split into individual afds which are being slowly rolled out, with a note being left at the bottom of the Ahoeitu afd as to which ones still have to be done (there were just too many to add to afd at one go, especially since they all need a bit of in-depth research). As such, this particular afd is still being edited. There's only about a dozen of them left to be re-afd'd, so it should only be another day or so before this can be closed off finally. Anyway, sorry for the rollback, and I hope it hasn't caused problems with afd in general! Grutness...wha? 03:37, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi again - yeah, I would have liked to have edited it normally rather than using rollback, but I only had access to an older IE browser at the time, and it limits editing to files 32kb long. This was was about 35, so if I'd edited it normally it would have chopped the end of it off (I hate IE...) Grutness...wha? 06:18, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm just closing it again - with Safari this time :) Cheers - Grutness...wha? 08:52, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (88/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you require assistance, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an administrator. Once again thank you and with kind regards Gryffindor 18:01, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for commenting on my recent request for bureaucratship. I deeply appreciate the comments and feedback that you left me; please don't hesitate to leave me more comments on how I can improve. I hope that I can improve and gain your support in the future. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 23:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Mailer Diablo, why do you fear Christians? I respect your right to be ignorant of Gods word, but running a cabal to oppress Christians is downright discriminatory and hateful. Please, I would like to open a dialogue and help you come to terms with the 95% of Americans who believe in Christs love.
Hmm, has two edits and sounds exactly like Jason Gastrich. He does seem to love the why do you hate/fear Christians line. Jason, are you aware that the absolutely worse person to harass with your sockpuppets right now is Mailer diablo given that he is the one who gets to decide on the AfD you tried to sock/meatpuppet earlier? JoshuaZ 00:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
I've blocked indef for trolling, ad I do smell a sock. NSLE(T+C) at 00:39 UTC (2006-04-03)
Yes it is. I've indef blocked too. A RCU and ANI is outstanding. - Mailer Diablo 00:42, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Someone added something to my talk page. Apparently this someone is what is called on wikipedia as a "sock puppet." You came in and deleted the comments. I thank you, but this was really not necessary. The spammer caused me no actual harm, and his comments actually seemed a bit humourous.
Again, I do thank you for your intending to help, but please don't feel obligated to provide this sort of help in the future (unless, of course, the spam were actually destructive in some manner).
Yours sincerely,
Alexander S. Peak President, College Libertarians of Towson Towson University, Maryland wwwnew.towson.edu/clt
Thank you for your support vote on my RFA. The final result was a successful request based on 111 support and 1 oppose. --CBDunkerson 12:02, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Great one thanks! - my first attempts at helping add to and expanding the Wikipedia Base deleted & roundly trashed with some rather insulting comments (K.G.Childs)! If this is the type of reaction new users can expect from the obviously far superior more experienced longer time users then I'll just not bother with it - or perhaps I'll be just as childish & go around nominating other pages randomly for deletion!
I assume from the comments added that you'll be going around ensureing that you delete all other authors & books from Wikipedia esp. the Wikipedia Novels Project for which this was my first involvment for.
2 questions for you & the mob who decided that my time is worthless to you;
i) how the hell can I gain any page history (one of the 'comments') if all that happens is any attempt I make gets deleted. I agree It needed a lot more work doing to it but is there no-one else out there who makes a start and has to leave something unpolished until they can make time to come back & finish it off?
To say that I'm pissed off is rather an understatement - I'm actually furious .... and if I ever hear of anyone thinking about adding to Wikipedia then I'll let them know there's little point as it'll just get deleted without any warning to them!
ii) so what if AuthorHouse are a bunch of useless muppets - is the author to be blacklisted becouse as a new author he's made a mistake? Instead of effectively standing there laughing at him they may want to offer some useful suggestions - but no that would be too easy - it's much more fun to simply laugh at someone elses mistakes or mishaps!
- Just in case you are wondering, No I'm Not the author, No I'm Not family, No I'm Not anything to do with AuthorHouse & No I've Never actually met the guy!
Frankly I did what other users here obviously find too difficult to do & attempted to do my bit in helping him out by making his stuff my first additions to the WilkiNovel project before starting on the rest of my SF&F books!
Sorry to have intruded on your private playground - obvously this is an invitation site only - if your name's not on the list you'll have your entries wiped !
I've not bothered logging in as there seems little point - you'll probably just delete this without fully reading it or replying anyway but should you feel the need to explain or defend what's gone on here then you can find my profile contact details from the page histories unless deleting them wipes that data!
Hi, your bot either missed rv'ing some of the edits. or (If my suspicion is right) was tricked into missing it. Either way I thought I should inform you about this. (if you take a closer look you'll one the use only partially rv'ed previous entries). Nifty bot btw.
--hydkat 20:18, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
I would appreciate you spending few minutes and either explaining or pointing me to appropriate resource.
1. What was the specific violation of me creating those two pages?
2. Is it appropriate to create wikipedia page about specific company? If not then why so many are around?
3. Should I just merge two article into one article?
I'm asking those questions from under two my hats - author of deleted articles and information architect involved into implementation of corporate wiki.
You can email me wikipedia@tarasul.com or talk me back on my user page.
The Malachi Barrie page is back -- this time with some changes as to "father's" cause of death (still substantially identical for purposes of speedy delete? I dunno). I put an AfD tag on it, but when I link to the AfD page, the old discussion page pops up and says not to edit it. How does one list a page for deletion when people keep putting the articles back? Tks. SigPig 01:01, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Hello Mailer diablo/Archive K: Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a final tally of 77/3/0. I hope I can perform at the standards expected for administrators. If I make any mistakes, or you need anything, please let me know. Prodegotalk 01:19, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Mailer diablo. Just a quick note to thank you for your support in my RfA, which recently passed 62/13/6. I will do my very best live up to this new responsibility and to serve the community, but please let me know if I make any mistakes or if you have any feedback at all on my actions. Finally, if there is anything that I can assist you with - please don't hesitate to ask. Cheers TigerShark 03:38, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "User:Mailer diablo/Archive K" page.
