User talk:Manushand

Hi Manushand. Welcome to English Wikipedia.

For a quick overview of what Wikipedia is, read Wikipedia:Wikipedia.
To ask for help or to talk with another editor, visit our Village pump.
To browse Wikipedia, take a look at our browsing start page.
To sign with a date, write four tildes (~~~~) and save.
Before creating new articles, consult our guide. You may practice how to edit a page at Sandbox.
Be bold.

Enjoy! --TravisM 07:34, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

I enjoyed reading your bio. You have lead a very interesting life. I'm glad a talented individual such as yourself is part of the Wikepedia brotherhood. I am a political scientist by training and as such have an appreciation of the famed Learned Hand, (a possible distant relative?). As for myself I edit a lot of films -- film noir, world films, and American. Best to you and your family. ♦ Luigibob ♦ ^{"Talk to Luigi!"} 03:15, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrestling terms with their own articles.

Hi. I see you've added "Blade", "Face" and "Heel" to the Glossary of professional wrestling terms. While these are no doubt wrestling terms, they have their own articles. The glossary's purpose is to explain unfamiliar terms, and is usually Wikilinked to from a wrestling article. In these cases, it would make more sense to Wikilink to the main articles on these terms, which explain them better. Duplicating them here doesn't serve much of a purpose, as far as I can see, and may encourage editors to link here instead of their articles, but maybe I'm overlooking something? InedibleHulk (talk) 23:26, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi back. Yeah, the issue I was seeing there was that there were uses of those terms in the other entries, which were unlinked. For example, Blue-Eye, said "See Babyface" and Babyface wasn't there at all, nor was it wikilinked to the article on "Face". So I thought maybe the thing to do would be put a brief entry for it but then link out to the main article with "(Main article)" wikilinked to "Face". Then I re-thought that and decided to just wikilink the term header. Yeah. I think the glossary should include all terms, since not everyone will have the same line between what is and is not a familiar term, but we definitely want to link to the main articles as visibly as we can, so that other articles won't just link to the glossary entry when there's a fuller entry. Hard to know what's best, huh? Manushand (talk) 23:20, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes. With a page like this, I think the main readership is comprised of fans who already know what face and heel mean (hard not to know, after any time on the wrestling-related Internet at all) and non-fans who are here to check on a word they read/clicked elsewhere on Wikipedia. In both cases, I think it works best to leave these terms out of the glossary and redirect any Wikilinks to the articles. That way, if they just want to know "It means good guy", they can glance at the lead. But if they want to read more, they don't have to click another link. Same should go for any other term with an article. Yes, there might be non-fans who want to know all the slang, for some reason. But how many could that be? I hear you on the "see Babyface" thing. I'd be for removing those, too, if it makes things simpler. Nobody really says blue-eye anymore, anyway. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:00, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I agree with you. Feel free to make the changes you're suggesting. I would hope, though, that any use of words like "face" and "heel" in the actual definitions of the terms would be wikilinked. Thanks for staying on top of things! Manushand (talk) 03:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed them, and Wikilinked to the articles in many of the entries where the terms are used. Not in every entry, per WP:OVERLINK, but once per letter section. I think this should be satisfactory, but if not, let me know. InedibleHulk (talk) 17:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comità per l'Útzil del Glheþ for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comità per l'Útzil del Glheþ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comità per l'Útzil del Glheþ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hermione is a dude (talk • contribs) 19:01, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Umpire changes database from Retrosheet

I saw that you were working on Brick Owens and I thought I would show you this, a list of games that had umpire changes mid-game. It's a neat list if you do much work on umpire articles. I'm not sure if you are still working on the entry, but this list covers the game in which Owens and Brennan were injured. EricEnfermero (Talk) 05:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Blanche Knopf

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/knopf-blanche-wolf, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:32, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lane Frost

You must provide a source saying that the George Strait song, “I Can Still Make Cheyenne,” was written about Lane Frost. Otherwise, I have deleted that statement. Zredman (talk) 10:53, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of films featuring time loops, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 05:11, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm 4TheWynne. I noticed that you recently removed content from Australian Football League without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 01:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Bri. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Miss Wyoming Teen USA, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 05:07, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Carole Ita White edit

I have reverted your addition of an unsourced date of birth to Carole Ita White. In addition to Wikipedia's basic principle of citing sources (Wikipedia:Citing sources), a special need for citations applies with regard to elements of a biography of a living person (WP:BLPPRIVACY). Feel free to add a date of birth when it is accompanied by a citation to a reliable, published source. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hi Manushand! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Men Without Hats that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. You seem to mark ALL of your edits as minor ones, whether they are or aren’t. Minor edits are reserved for typos and corrections of obvious vandalism. Please refrain from continuing doing so unless the edits fit the criteria of a minor edit. NJZombie (talk) 03:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]