User talk:MarioFan123

November 2016

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide episodes. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. You are changing dates without explanation, and without providing sourcing for the changed dates – please stop until you can do one or the other (preferably both). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MarioFan123, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MarioFan123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Amazing World of Gumball (season 3), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:KIDSTVDATES. SummerPhD^v2.0 22:53, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nickelodeon, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:13, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User page creation

Hi there, why did you create this user page? User pages are typically the domain of the account holder and there's no obvious reason for you to create a page for this person. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, just was testing something, won't happen again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarioFan123 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We Bare Bears Episode List

I un-reverted your changes. Refer to the Talk page:

Talk:List_of_We_Bare_Bears_episodes

Rubyaxles (talk) 00:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Be Cool, Scooby-Doo, you may be blocked from editing. Don't change sourced information with falsified ratings. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 14:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Peterye2005 (talk) 22:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info! MarioFan123 (talk) 19:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence for "Escape From the Null Void"

Please don't add it back to any of the reboot's related pages. Thank you. PassportPortpass (talk) 22:06, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Regular Show. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 13:00, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Adventure Time" FAN

I know that you often edited the Adventure Time page, and I was wondering if you might be able to drop by the article's FAN review page and perhaps leave a comment or two? Thanks!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:13, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will! MarioFan123 (talk) 15:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I appreciate it.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 20:27, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Hi Mario123 I am Percy and I will be helpful to you. Percy7875 (talk) 17:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon

I see you encountered the latest troublemaker at List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon. I suspect that CurtisJeans is really Kenzie2012 evading its block. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:47, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mario1234 I have heard you are a good editor.Ennaelol666 (talk) 17:50, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adventure Time season 7, 8, 9

Just wanted to say sorry if I reverted any of your edits today accidentally. I was caught off guard by the reveal that CN considers season 7 to be only 26 eps long, but I decided to go full-steam and modify everything to have it match up with what they're say. At the same time, I've been trying to prevent people from undoing the articles.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:14, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mario123.Inalol (talk) 16:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Arthur episodes. You have been repeatedly warned not to make unsourced/unexplained changes. Several of the warnings said that your changes appeared to be deliberately false. You have not responded to any of these warnings and are continuing with the problematic behavior.

If you make any more unsourced, unexplained changes, you will be blocked from editing. If you do not understand, please discuss the issue on this talk page before editing. SummerPhD^v2.0 02:46, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of The Loud House episodes. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at List of The Loud House episodes.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Hello there, I'd like to kindly address you to stop edit warring at the article List of Rabbids Invasion episodes. The article Archived 2017-06-22 at the Wayback Machine was written by a man named Mitch Metcalf, while the comment you are refering to was posted by Mitch Salem. That coincidentally both authors are named Mitch does not make them the same person, and your claim null and void. As I already stated, we need a reliable secondary source on the matter, where a comment on a secondary source is clearly an unreliable tertiary source. Also please keep in mind that, if you are reverted, to not just revert over and over and over, but instead discuss at the editor's or article's talk page why there would be an issue with your edit or you think that it should be inserted. Disputes will unlikely ever be resolved just throguh edit warring. Thanks and take care! Lordtobi (✉) 20:48, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Lordtobi: They are not the same person, but they both work for Showbuzz Daily. See here Archived 2020-09-09 at the Wayback Machine. When a program doesn't make the top 150 chart posted by Metcalf, people are more than welcome to ask for the ratings for the sub-top 150 programs in comments and Salem will respond with the ratings. Comments from him are perfectly reliable, and he's also even posted the official top 150 chart himself sometimes in the past. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:01, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Morty Smith

Mind taking a go at it? HarrisonSteam (talk) 21:28, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MarioFan123. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nickelodeon Shows Page

Hi, I keep trying to edit the list of nickelodeon shows page, to have the shows by listed by years/dates and not alphabetically (like how it used to be) and this user called 2601:1c1:8902:6b06:c562:e9f6:e7af:7f08 keeps undoing my edits, saying "it is impossible to not have the shows listed alphabetically". I was wondering could you block him or something and/or help me try to restore this page? Thanks and have a good day. 04:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Brandy + Penny (talk)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MarioFan123. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 06:11, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Loud House

Hi, MarioFan123. My name is Jack. Do you think there are 104 episodes and 199 segments of The Loud House? It says there are 105 episodes and 200 segments of the show. I saw in a past edit you said there were 104 episodes and 199 segments of The Loud House, but then Magitroopa changed it to 105 episodes and 200 segments because he thought the Hangin at Home Special counts as an episode. But I don't think it counts as an episode. It's a special. It's not an episode. When "Schooled!" airs on TV, that will be the 105th episode and 203rd segment because that has 4 segments because it's an hour-long episode and 199+4=203 segments. I am thinking you don't think the Hangin at Home Special counts as an episode because you said in your edit there were 104 episodes and 199 segments. But just the bottom line is, do you think there are 104 episodes and 199 segments? I think so. I am trying to gain consensus for a change in the number of episodes and segments to change the template to edit semi-protected, and I was wondering if you could change it back to 104 episodes and 199 segments for me because that's how many episodes and segments there are in the show and I just want the article to look like it's right and for now, though, I just don't think it's looks right. So if you could do this for me, that would be great, MarioFan123. Thank you and I sincerely appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:1000:387E:31FF:D894:1068:37EC (talk) 23:43, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, MarioFan123. Are you there to respond to whatever I told you earlier? Please respond as soon as you can. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:1000:387E:31FF:D894:1068:37EC (talk) 01:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

yes the hanging at home special doesnt count as in episode and there are 104 episodes of the loud house not 105 but wikipedia doesn't want the facts and continues to spread misinformation on a ton of articles MarioFan123 (talk) 06:13, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. Wikipedia is an unreliable source. I may stop going to it soon because I can't stand any of the misinformation that they give sometimes. But I was going to ask, could you please change it back to 104 episodes and 199 segments like it was earlier before Magitroopa changed it to 105 episodes and 200 segments because of Magitroopa thinking the Hangin at Home Special counts as an episode where in fact it doesn't? I'd appreciate it if you would do this for me because I cannot edit that page, but you can because I saw a contribution on that page from you. Thank you, MarioFan123. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:1000:387E:31FF:D894:1068:37EC (talk) 12:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if Magitroopa or someone else changes it back to 105 episodes and 200 segments, could you please change it back to 104 episodes and 199 segments and keep doing it if they keep changing it to 105 episodes and 200 segments because that's wrong and 104 episodes and 199 segments is right. So if you do this for me, I'd appreciate it. Again, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:1000:387E:31FF:D894:1068:37EC (talk) 12:19, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Are you there to respond to my new things I told you after you said there were 104 episodes and 199 segments and not 105 episodes and 200 segments? Please respond as soon as you can. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:1000:387E:31FF:D894:1068:37EC (talk) 14:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah magitroopa has been doing this kind of stuff alot recently and I just don't feel like arguing with him about the correct information but I'll try and edit it again. MarioFan123 (talk) 15:28, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, MarioFan123. That would be great if you would change it to 104 episodes and 199 segments. When do you think you could do it? Because I want the correct information and I don't want any wrong information because 105 episodes and 200 segments is wrong, but 104 episodes and 199 segments is right. So when do you think you could change it to 104 episodes and 199 segments? I understand you don't want to argue with him about correct information, but I want correct information and I want it when editors are able to give me correct information, such as you. And 104 episodes and 199 segments is correct. Therefore, when do you think you could change it to 104 episodes and 199 segments? Could you at least do this for me because I want correct information. I don't want false information. We are here to edit Wikipedia with true information if there is anything false, so when will you delete the false information and put in the true information? If you need to block Magitroopa or an editor because they keep putting in the wrong information, then you should do that. Because we need correct information. We need to improve Wikipedia until it has all correct information and no false information. So, when do you think you could do this for me? If you do this for me, I would appreciate it, MarioFan123. Thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:1000:387E:31FF:D894:1068:37EC (talk) 16:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you there, MarioFan123? You haven't responded to my response yet. Please respond to it as soon as possible. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:1000:387E:31FF:D894:1068:37EC (talk) 17:42, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MarioFan123, you said you would try and edit it again, but I see that you didn't edit it. It still says 105 episodes and 200 segments! When you get a chance, please change it back to 104 episodes and 199 segments. I want this changed back to the correct information, so when you get a chance, please do it! Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:1000:387E:31FF:D894:1068:37EC (talk) 20:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will get to it when I get the chance I've been doing other stuff. MarioFan123 (talk) 20:45, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Sorry for bothering you, then. I didn't know you were busy right now. But I want you to let me know once you fix the issue. OK? I understand you're busy now and I'll let you be now because you're busy, but I still want the correct information and so I am not going to the page until you let me know that you fixed the issue. So, just the bottom line is, when you get a chance, when you're done being busy and when you fix the issue, please let me know that you fixed it. I would appreciate it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:1000:387E:31FF:D894:1068:37EC (talk) 20:54, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, MarioFan123. Good evening from where I am at now. Are you done doing whatever you have to do now? Can you change the number of episodes to 104 and the number of segments to 199 now? If you're able to do this now, that would be great! Also, when you make the edit, can you be specific in explaining what edit you made saying the hangin at home special doesn't count as an actual episode of the loud house and so that's why you changed the number of episodes to 104 episodes and the number of segments to 199 segments because it does have segments even though it isn't an actual episode and if it were an actual episode, it would be the 200th segment, but it's not an actual episode, so there are only 199 segments. If you would do this for me, that would be excellent. I think that will explain to Magitroopa and the other editors as to why you made that edit. Then that way, they'll understand your reasoning and then they will stop changing it. So, if you're able to do this right now, that would be great. Thank you, MarioFan123. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:1000:387E:31FF:D894:1068:37EC (talk) 01:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you're not able to do this right now, then please do it whenever you can. I really want it changed when you are able to change it, so when you get a chance, please change it and let me know once you do it so I can take a look at it. Thank you so much for your help in all this. I appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:1000:387E:31FF:D894:1068:37EC (talk) 02:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, MarioFan123. Are you there to respond to my couple of responses I gave you? If you are there and are able to respond to them, then please do that. I need a response from you, so please, if you're able to respond now, I expect a response from you now. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:1000:387E:31FF:D894:1068:37EC (talk) 12:50, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, MarioFan123. I saw that your edit got reverted by Magitroopa! I am so mad that he reverted your edit! Is there any way you could block him for edit warring with you and then he won't be able to edit for some time, depending on how long you block him? I want that edit back in there like you did before, but I am suggesting that you block him for changing it again and then he won't be able to edit for a long time, depending on how long you ban him from editing, and then you put your change back in there and then that's it. He won't be able to edit, so he can't make changes. How about that? Let me know if you think about doing that. Thank you for trying and editing it again. I appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:1000:387E:31FF:D894:1068:37EC (talk) 13:23, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Or if you aren't an administrator, ask one to block Magitroopa for edit warring with you when you were just trying to make a reasonable edit. Then let's hope they block Magitroopa as a result. Then you can make the edit and then Magitroopa won't be able to change it because he got blocked by the administrator. Then that way, that'll be it with that and then we can move on from there. How about that, MarioFan123? Let me know if you can do that if you aren't an administrator. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:1000:387E:31FF:D894:1068:37EC (talk) 13:55, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on SpongeBob SquarePants (season 12); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You are consistently edit warring over the number of episodes in different articles/seasons/series. Please stop edit warring and actually discuss the issue rather than continuously reverting just because you don't agree (per WP:BRD). Magitroopa (talk) 20:09, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Final Space episodes

The source listed for episodes 9 and 10 leads to a spreadsheet by a rating website that did have the ratings for that day, just under another tab. I'll keep it blank for now, but I will reinstate it. wizzito | say hello! 00:35, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy

Drop the stick. Waiting until a few days to revert changes you don't like is not going to work. Unless you have a source saying the show was never cancelled, please stop vandalizing the article with misinformation. If you continue, I will take further action. Nyescum (talk) 19:45, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is that vandalizing, the article was like that for yearssss so I don’t understand why it’s being changed now? Why are you coming in making random pointless changes? Who even are you, you don’t even have a page here?? The hiatus from its first cancellation till its return wasn’t even that long, November 2003 to May 2005, renewed May 2004, so I think it’s pointless to make the distinction because it was barely a hiatus. MULTIPLE other animated shows that were actually dead for years have no distinction but Family Guy needs one?? Makes no sense. And how can you take action on me you don’t even have a page here or any admin status?? Weird power trip energy here MarioFan123 (talk) 00:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also Family Guy was cancelled not once BUT TWICE by your logic there should be another distinction, see how unnecessary that is?? Another show for example The Fairly OddParents was cancelled FIVE times within short periods of time. By your logic there should distinctions there too but there’s not because it’s unnecessary. MarioFan123 (talk) 00:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In past revisions, there was no need to mention the first "cancellation", as it was extremely brief. Please note that this article inspired this change to the TV infobox. If it weren't for that, my changes wouldn't exist. By the way, I do not need any rights to make a report, and please visit WP:RSP next time, as what you said was incorrect. Thank you. Nyescum (talk) 00:46, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was not that brief it was almost a year gap between Seasons 2 and 3. Season 3 ended in November 2003 with Season 4 starting May 2005. That gap is not much different then the gap between Seasons 2 and 3. MarioFan123 (talk) 00:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other sources like the NYT and TIME stated the series was cancelled in 2002. New episodes didn't air on Fox for three years. That's pretty significant. Nyescum (talk) 01:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]