User talk:MarkSewath

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Никита-Родин-2002 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome!

Press here, to start a dialogue

Hello! Greetings to you on my talk page. To add a new topic for conversation, click on the button above.

Archives: 2017

Once wrote to me and now can't find the topic? Use the search in my archives by entering a keyword:

Thank you for your attention! For been a day!

Best regards, MarkSewath.

Don't ask other editors for their personal information

Please don't ask other editors where they live, even if they are editing abusively. Wikipedia is very careful about protecting its editors' anonymity. Secondly, unfortunately it is sometimes hard to understand your written English, so it may be a good idea to stay out of arguments (especially with disruptive editors with a combative attitude) until your command of the language is a little better. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 13:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea: Thank you. MarkSewath (talk) 13:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My pages

Hi Mark, thanks so much for the welcome - it's lovely to hear from a real person! I'd be so grateful if you could check my draft for Sompting Abbotts Preparatory School, I've tried to cover all the bases but I am new to this so please let me know if I need to make amendments? Sarah-Monaghan (talk) 15:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Sarah-Monaghan[reply]

Ways to improve Kagalnik

Hi, I'm Boleyn. MarkSewath, thanks for creating Kagalnik!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 08:38, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Boleyn: Thank you!. MarkSewath (talk) 09:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

MarkSewath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19934 was submitted on Dec 04, 2017 13:07:17. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:07, 4 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

MarkSewath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19947 was submitted on Dec 05, 2017 04:16:55. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:16, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MarkSewath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock, blocked error. MarkSewath (talk) 05:22, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:09, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.