User talk:Marlindale

Welcome!

Hello, Marlindale, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Reify-tech (talk) 19:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on Johannes Brahms were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved by another user. In the future you can use the "New section" link in top right. For more details see talk page guidelines. Thank you. Reify-tech (talk) 20:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marlindale, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Marlindale! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

American String Quartet

Thanks for your interesting addition to the article. I felt, however, that making it a separate section, and putting it immediately after the lead of the article, was a bit of overkill. So I added the quotes to the "Composition" section, and also included a reference to the use of the pentatonic in spirituals. I removed the examples, though. I thought they might be appropriate in the article on spirituals, but not particularly relevant to this article.

Regards, and keep up the good work. --Ravpapa (talk) 06:54, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Symphony No. 9 (Dvořák) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

But insofar as the influence was by way of the [[pentatonic scale], it would apply more to the Quartet than to the Symphony. Dvořák did, it seems,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:28, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Antonín Dvořák

You're welcome! Hyacinth (talk) 00:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Johann Sebastian Bach may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:51, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Piano Concerto No. 1 (Brahms), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ferdinand David. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Symphony No. 9 (Dvořák), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spiritual. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Clara Schumann may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

once." She wrote that\ "musical artists" in England "allow themselves to be treated as inferiors."<Litzmann 1913, vol. 2, p. 133</ref> She was happy, though, to hear the cellist [[Alfredo Piatti]]
*1855· ''Sechs lieder aus jucunde von Hermann Rollet'', Op. 23 (1. ''Was weinst du, Blümein?''; 2. An einem lichten Morgen''; 3. Geheimes Flüstern''; 4. Auf einem

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to meet you

	Handshake
	Hello. I don't think I've ever seen you before you thanked me. Nice to see someone "new". I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 10:04, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stowell and Beethoven Violin Concerto

Hi Marlindale! I just noticed your edit listing Stowell as editor, rather than author, of his book on the Beethoven Violin Concerto. I have just double-checked my copy and I can't see any sign that's the case - there are no other authors listed in the title page, in the preface or in the individual chapter headings. So I just wanted to check if you had some other reason for thinking that's the case...? Thanks, The Land (talk) 09:17, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your excellent contributions at Clara Schumann. Wikipedia needs more content writers like you. Altamel (talk) 02:19, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Altamei. The Litzmann book helped me a lot. Marlindale (talk) 20:00, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 1 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bach

Thank you for adding to Bach. Please always mention a citation, even for facts that you think everybody knows, as his youngest son. I also am not happy with writing about his future profession and style when he is is born, in an article about a man where we don't have room for soooo many other things. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:47, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of the composer sons I decided to mention only CPE Bach in the Lead. I wanted to mention JC Bach somewhere. At first I thought I would put him in Legacy but I didn't see a good opportunity there. I tried to put him in chronologically by his date of birth, although I also was not comfortable with that. But I have Spitta to consult for a citation. I will try to revise while avoiding too much length. Marlindale (talk) 06:09, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In the lead of the JC Bach article it's said he influenced Mozart's concerto style. Important if so? But I don't suggest repeating that in the JS Bach article. Spitta conveys "youngest son" by calling him the "Benjamin" of the family, a known expression which I think we don't need to get into. Marlindale (talk) 06:38, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joachim String Quartet (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joachim String Quartet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:09, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Great work at Clara Schumann! Monxton (talk) 13:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RfC in progress on Bach

There is an RfC in progress on Bach which is open. Wikipedia policy and guidelines are to await completion of the RfC related to Bach Legacy and Bach Death prior to editing to establish consensus on the Talk page. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 15:58, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renotification of your edit warring and that the RfC is still open. You have been informed previously that the RfC for this issue on Bach is still open and that the Wikipedia guidelines and policy is to be observed. Please follow Wikipedia guidelines and make consensus on the Talk page prior to forcing your edits into the article before consensus for the open RfC is established. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 16:03, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antonín Dvořák, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Josef Suk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DRN

You apparently filed two requests for dispute resolution about Johann Sebastian Bach. Both requests were malformed. Don't worry; it is easy to malform a request for dispute resolution, because they are complicated. I deleted the second request, which had the composer's name misspelled. I removed the malformed links from the first request. However, you failed to notify the other editors of the filing. As a result, the request can't be opened until you notify them and they agree. Post {{DRN-notice}} on their talk pages. Also, there had been a question about the status of an RFC. Some editors thought that it was No Consensus. Some thought that it was open. Both were right. I have closed it as No Consensus. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Draft:Joachim String Quartet concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Joachim String Quartet, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the draft I listed the four members of the Quartet at its founding, but these soon changed and I did not see how to create an article, so I gave up and am content with deletion. Marlindale (talk) 00:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bach editing notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 18:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amy Beach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Chadwick. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 11 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Amy Beach page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Amy Beach may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

been recorded by pianists Kirsten Johnson, Joanne Polk, and Virginia Eskin (see the Discography)).
/www.gramophone.co.uk/review/beach-piano-concerto-symphony-no-2 |accessdate=January 9, 2016}}</ref>}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:34, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

composer biographies

Thank you for quality contributions, based on scientific background, to our understanding of composers such as Bach and Dvořák, shedding light also on Brahms, more on Amy Beach and Peter Maxwell Davies, always with precise edit summaries, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

On Bach's "birthday" - how beautiful, - please feel free to check "my" articles, especially the one coming up for Easter, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1353 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the prize and reminder. The large number of recipients seems a credit to Wikipedia as a whole. Marlindale (talk) 14:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I feel the same! When I am depressed over aspects of the project (just read the word in a FAC), a look at the many reasons for praise helps. Calling Yunshui. - I have a Bach FAC open, - perhaps you want to comment? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Four years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bach for Easter

Thank you for the many improvements. I will go sing now, Easter vigil service, and sleep, and guests, and another service tomorrow, - please keep an eye on things and don't expect help right now, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:55, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thanks for the edits. Let's go listen to BWV249 now ... :-) Tony (talk) 08:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joachim String Quartet

Hello, Marlindale. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Joachim String Quartet".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:33, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of female composers by birth date may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

] (1858—1944); [[Amy Beach]] (1867–1944); [[Rebecca Clarke (composer)|Rebecca Clarke]] 1886—1979); [[Nadia Boulanger]] (1887–1979); [[Lili Boulanger]] (1893–1918);

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brahms

I was surprised you threw in the towel so quickly. Geiringer cites this "one piece" not as an exception, but as an example, one among many, many, that confirm the integral nature of contrapuntal writing in Brahms's style. You (and Geiringer, Swafford, and just about every other scholar who has written about Brahms) are right, and Tony, despite his authoritative (should I say supercillious?) tone, is wrong. Ravpapa (talk) 17:47, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Marlindale. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 1 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Violin Sonata in G minor (Tartini) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question on Romanian Folk Dances

Hi,

it seems you could be quite comfortable for this, a recent edit on the page reffered in the subject [1] is not clear to me if it is a possible vandalism or a jusful addition, could you look on to it?

Thanks(KIENGIR (talk) 22:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Hello, I found a WP article Gypsy scale. I hadn't been familiar with this before. It doesn't look to me as if the revision is vandalism. Marlindale (talk) 02:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sofia Gubaidulina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nadia Boulanger

Hi there - noted your recent edit to the NB article, changing references from her surname to her given name. Unless I'm mistaken, MOS:SURNAME asks for subsequent references to be surname only? Just wanted to check with you in case I'm mistaken. Kind regards, pgbrown (talk)

Thanks for your comment. Male composers are usually referred to by their surnames, such as Bach, Beethoven, Mozart. But I think female ones seem better referred to by their given names, for example Clara Schumann as Clara, Amy Beach as Amy, Nadia Boulanger as Nadia, Lili Boulanger as Lili. Marlindale (talk) 18:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:SURNAME does not differentiate between genders and I'm not sure they should be handled any differently (except in the case of Clara Schumann, when the use of her surname would cause confusion with her husband, so first names would make sense for both of them), but I'm not going to argue the point. All the best, pgbrown (talk) 13:21, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Beach, pianist and composer, was a married name (Amy Marcy Cheney Beach), married to a physician, Dr. H. H. A. Beach. Marlindale (talk) 16:04, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Marlindale. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Marlindale. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Missing

Thank you for what you did for the Clara Schumann article! It's open for peer review, and FAC for Jauchzet, frohlocket!, DYK? We miss Brian who would have helped. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:05, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Leopold Auer

Hello Marlindale,

thank you for detailing the locations of Auers teaching in Leopold Auer - Wikipedia

Can you please give reference to your source(s)? I would like to read more on Auer teaching in Dresden / Dresden-Loschwitz. KlausJürgenWald (talk) 09:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]