User talk:Maseracing
|
Hi there. There are (almost) no results in an internet search query for "IA-Mass", "Ion attached mass spectrometry" or "Ion Attached Mass spectrometer". If you do not cite reliable references, this article has to be deleted. Thank you. --Leyo 12:13, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- You have provided the large majority of edits to this article. Being largely unfamiliar with this technique, members of the WikiProject Chemistry community have certain comments and questions here. Would you care to comment? Thanks and regards. --Rifleman 82 11:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Tracer-gas method testing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. – Tivedshambo (talk) 20:31, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Good article. If you have translated it from another language (perhaps French), let me know the name of the article and language you translated it from, and I'll add the interwiki links. You can also add them yourself if you're familiar with how. It may also be the case that you meant to title the article Wines of Savoy, the historical area, and not Savoie, which refers to the département on the English Wikipedia. -Oreo Priest 01:08, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Edit summaries
[edit]Hi Maseracing. Can I make a request? When you add interwiki links to articles, can you please add an edit summary indicating what you have done? It doesn't need to be much, just "+iw" or "+fr", or something like that. It just saves people who are watching the articles from having to examine the differences. Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 13:22, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello DH !
I will (try) do so ! I guess your comment is related to my adding of the fr: link in the Maserati A6 article ? If I may make a suggestion on the A6 article, I would split in two, the "monoposto" on one side, the remaining on another... Cheers ! Maseracing (talk) 16:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- That's probably a good idea. Are you happy for me to copy your suggestion to the article's talk page? (Or you could do it). DH85868993 (talk) 00:57, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Please do ! Thanks Maseracing (talk) 05:35, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- I've added your suggestion to the article's talk page and added a {{split-apart}} template into the article. DH85868993 (talk) 10:06, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Profluid, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.profluid.org/en/page_overview_1.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:35, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Please note that upon review, the above was found to remain an extremely close paraphrase of the source material and has been deleted due to copyright concerns. The problem is that any further tweaks to the original text will remain an unauthorized derivative work of the source, it is therefore better to restart from scratch, without any copy / pasted material.
- If you need any help, you can create a new section on your talk page and add {{helpme}} followed by your request below it, someone will be along shortly to assist you. Alternatively, you may also leave me a message on my talk page. Best regards, MLauba (talk) 15:44, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Rossignol Technology a.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rossignol Technology a.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Rossignol Technology
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Rossignol Technology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AllyD (talk) 09:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- Following up on your query on my Talk page: To retrieve the deleted content of this page, I suggest contacting User talk:RHaworth, who closed that CSD. One other thing though: your message on my Talk page was written in a plural voice rather than I-voice. It may just be a figure of speech, but it suggests you may be editing on behalf of a group? Please note WP:COI. AllyD (talk) 14:39, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Adixen Vacuum Products
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Adixen Vacuum Products requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)