User talk:Massintel

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Massintel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not sure why I was blocked. It says I was abused, I wasn't abused. I tried to edit the Waxhaw page and added a useful statistical reference about the growth of the area. Massintel (talk) 20:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. I don't see any indication this account is blocked; if you're getting a block notice, follow the instructions so we know what's going on and can maybe fix it. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 21:56, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It says the request was reviewed by an administrator and was not changed.. the instructions just say to post in the talk page. --Massintel (talk) 00:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced information about living people

Hi - please take a look at WP:BLP. In this edit, you made an assertion about a living person, without any indication that it is referenced. I appreciate that it's a talk page, rather than an article, but we have to be cautious about that sort of thing. Please don't repeat gossip or rumours you have heard here - stick to what can be verified by reliable sources. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 16:00, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:2020 United States presidential election. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 01:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't delete or edit the talk page! I added links, the other person asked. The rules are not working- Wikipedia filled with trolls and misinformation. --Massintel (talk) 14:40, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:28, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:One America News Network, you may be blocked from editing. Doug Weller talk 16:28, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:49, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what was the edit? I'm trying hard to follow the rules and contribute. Massintel (talk) 01:33, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"We"

Please explain who "we" are [1] Acroterion (talk) 15:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I feel you need to read WP:NOTDUMB. Slatersteven (talk) 16:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]