User talk:Master Bob Jenkins

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Master Bob Jenkins/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:40, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Master Bob Jenkins, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:40, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of San jitsu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on San jitsu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Amanrajveer (talk) 01:15, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frank E. Sanchez

The article Frank E. Sanchez has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 14:33, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, as you did with Frank E. Sanchez, unless reliable sources have been provided. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 01:39, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue, as you did with Frank E. Sanchez, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. reddogsix (talk) 01:39, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Frank E. Sanchez, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 01:40, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Frank E. Sanchez, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. reddogsix (talk) 01:40, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm NickW557. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to World Head of Family Sokeship Council— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 02:14, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve San jitsu

Hi, I'm AC325. Master Bob Jenkins, thanks for creating San jitsu!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. There are no links on the page. Links can be done via using double brackets around a word or phrase.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. AC325 (talk) 17:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frank E. Sanchez

You will notice I have once again removed your attempt at referencing the article Frank E. Sanchez. I have done so because the method you have used is not correct. Please review the one reference I added to the article and use this method to add references. If you have any questions, please please let me know. reddogsix (talk) 02:08, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

San jitsu

added a link pointing to Jiu Jitsu

World Head of Family Sokeship Council

added a link pointing to Jiu Jitsu

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: World Head of Family Sokeship Council (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vincent60030 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Master Bob Jenkins/World Head of Family Sokeship Council and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vincent60030 (talk) 06:54, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Master Bob Jenkins, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vincent60030 (talk) 06:54, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: World Head of Family Sokeship Council (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:World Head of Family Sokeship Council and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 23:46, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Master Bob Jenkins, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 23:46, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

San jitsu

Please stop manually adding "references." Please use the and in the article. I have added a reference to the article these tags - please refer to this as an example. Also you cannot use Wikipedia as a reference, so please stop using other articles as a reference. reddogsix (talk) 14:31, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of San jitsu

The article San jitsu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable martial arts. The article lacks independent and in-depth support. A google search shows the only support to be mainly listings places that teach the style.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 14:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of San jitsu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on San jitsu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 14:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harold G. Long (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Master Bob Jenkins/Harold G. Long and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Master Bob Jenkins, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: World Head of Family Sokeship Council (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:World Head of Family Sokeship Council and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 16:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of World Head of Family Sokeship Council

Hello Master Bob Jenkins,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged World Head of Family Sokeship Council for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 22:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of World heads of family sokeship council

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on World heads of family sokeship council requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 22:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive COI editing, as you did at World Head of Family Sokeship Council. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you because you have repeatedly tried to re-add the article for the World Head of Family Sokeship Council to Wikipedia. It was deleted at AfD back in July by Davewild. There was a copy in the draftspace that was moved there by Ritchie333 with the intention that you would continue to edit and improve that page, but you seem to have tried to move it back to the mainspace without it being run through a second person. This was when it was brought to AfD, where it closed as a delete. After this you tried to re-add it to Wikipedia and it was deleted by another admin prior to me finding the page at World Head of Family Sokeship Council and World heads of family sokeship council. From the response at the Teahouse it looks like you had sought out assistance before and did not seem to fully heed their advice. You have also tried to add in other COI pages at Frank E. Sanchez and San jitsu, the latter of which you tried to recreate even after deletion. This can be seen as you spamming Wikipedia (at worst) and at best it is extremely disruptive. People have tried to work with you on this and you seem intent to post articles to the mainspace rather than go through AfC.

I do understand that it can be difficult for new users to understand policy when they're coming into Wikipedia with a conflict of interest. However I do have to wonder if your conflict of interest is too strong in this instance for you to be able to really neutrally write an article about this organization or anything associated with it. If you are unblocked you will need to agree to the following:

That you will not try to re-add this organization, its founder, or anything relating to this organization to the mainspace. Any new article contributions will have to go exclusively through WP:AfC. No exceptions. Ideally you would not edit about this organization at all and will work with an established editor to make the AfC draft.
That you will not make direct edits to the mainspace about anything that you may have a conflict of interest about, specifically the Council, Sanchez, and San Jitsu. If articles about these topics are ever accepted to the mainspace, you can request changes be made on the userpage.
State that you understand the reason for your block. Do you understand how reposting content can be seen as disruptive? Do you understand how some of the content could be seen as promotional?
State how you will edit Wikipedia if unblocked. Do you only want to write about the organization and its people?

I would also recommend that you go through one of the training modules, either WP:TRAINING or WP:ADVENTURE. This will give you an overview of policy. TRAINING is better, but ADVENTURE will keep a record of your progression through the training process. I'll be very honest - unless you can convince us that you will stick to AfC and that you will refrain from writing about your organization in the mainspace, it's unlikely that you will be unblocked. I notice that you tried to add some of the promotional/deleted article content to your userpage. Your usertalk is not meant to be used as a placeholder for deleted content. Because of this, I'm going to delete that content and repost the warnings that has been posted on this page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for the inconvenience with my many submissions. I tried to submit too many articles at the same time and became confused with the responses. I now understand what I did was inappropriate and will not commit the same errors. I hereby respectfully request that I be "unblocked"

What do you plan on editing about if you are unblocked? Do you plan on adding things about your organization and if so, where will you post them? Do you plan on editing about things other than your organization? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Master Bob Jenkins/Harold G. Long

Hello, Master Bob Jenkins. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Harold G. Long".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:57, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]