User talk:MatryoshkaNL

Our Homeland Movement (Mi Hazánk Mozgalom)

Hello! Why you reverted my edit on the Our Homeland Movement page ? Why ? Their color is white and green! I don't know why you reverted it, but it's not okay. Tell me please, you know the party's color which is ? It's green and white. The Jobbik's color is red, white and green, and the Mi Hazánk's color is white and green. --TomFZ67 (talk) 19:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the addition

Het probleem op deze aarde is het eikeloverschot. Ja, ik praat geheimtaal. Ik neem aan dat je dat wel begrijpt. Nice update, because I didn't have to look for it myself ;) KittenKlub (talk) 16:46, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Moshtakarah 2019 logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Moshtakarah 2019 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arab–Israeli confict discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please note that users with less than 500 edits may not edit in the area of conflict, see WP:A/I/PIA, thanks. --IamNotU (talk) 14:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm Aguy777. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bakpau, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aguy777 (talk) 01:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fake party (Hungary) has been accepted

Fake party (Hungary), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 (talk) 18:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I Can See Your Voice (Dutch game show)

Hello MatryoshkaNL, I'm your contributor in related to international mystery music game show franchise, I Can See Your Voice. Sorry for your inconvenience because i can't watch ICSYVNL, because i'm lived in the Philippines.

I need a help to assist and contribute you for the Dutch version of ICSYV.

In order to do make episode results, you have to:

Watch the whole show on RTL4 channel from 20:30 to 22:30
Watch the replay by visiting rtlxl.nl and click "I Can See Your Voice"

During the show, write down the mystery singers' elimination order, and focus on the mystery singer's name and its alias name. i.e.

4. Name (alias)
2. Name (alias)
6. Name (alias)
1. Name (alias)
3. Name (alias)
Winner: 5. Name (alias)

After that, you can now edit down these results on the episode list. Note that templates {{yes}} (for good singer) and {{no}} (for bad singer) are sampled for you!

That's it and greetings. Makoy Canlas (talk) 11:59, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not watch I Can See Your Voice. Sorry. MatryoshkaNL (talk) 12:54, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums § Proposed merger of articles about elections in the Caribbean Netherlands and Netherlands Antilles

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums § Proposed merger of articles about elections in the Caribbean Netherlands and Netherlands Antilles. ― Ætoms ^[talk] 19:59, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bedankt...

...voor de informatie over de Nederlandse IP. Als deze IP altijd op de pagina von Kahane (niet Anetta Kahane) schrijft, dann zou het niet zo moeilijk zijn, ze altijd in de gaten tr houden. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 16:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MatryoshkaNL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The IP range from Tmobile NL has apparently been blocked in its entirely. Seems Skylar "from Katzrin" is also using mobile hotspots in the Netherlands... I'm using a mobile hotspot as the place where I'm staying at does not have wifi. MatryoshkaNL (talk) 18:16, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL ^{Query me!} 23:44, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have found a wifi network nearby, its weak but it works for wiki usage.

December 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 09:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm blocking you because you've engaged in clearly disruptive sockpuppetry as demonstrated by solid CheckUser information. I'm withholding details for the sake of your privacy but if you like I can share the general summary (without revealing any specific personal information of course). Seriously, you've wasted a lot of community time with these actions. This block is a second chance; if this kind of thing happens again the block will most definitely be indefinite. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 09:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 18:25, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I must admit that this block is correct. Editing wiki has been detrimental to myself, so I did this intentionally, although it's a stupid way to do that. Apologies for the inconvenience. MatryoshkaNL (talk) 18:56, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]