User talk:Medgeorgia

Georgian alphabet

Hi. Your recent activity on the Georgian alphabet article is — whether you intended to do this or not — likely to be seen as a continuation of an edit war which another editor started waging a few days ago. If you honestly believe the material in question does not belong, regardless of the fact that it appears to be supported by reliable sources, then you need to participate in a discussion with other editors on the article's talk page and reach some sort of consensus before proceeding. It may very possibly end up being the case that this article should outline multiple, opposing views in keeping with the neutral point of view policy. But even if you are convinced that you are right, and everyone else is wrong, and that there is nothing to discuss, this is still not acceptable on Wikipedia as an excuse for edit warring. If you make any more attempts to impose this particular editing of the article without a general consensus to do so, you are likely to be blocked from editing in order to protect Wikipedia from damage by edit warring and other disruptive editing practices. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 23:51, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think that the Armenians did the Georgian alphabet.

Now, I do not want to take part in any discussion.--Medgeorgia (talk) 16:29, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

Please see this thread. J Milburn (talk) 23:52, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

arning

You have been edit-warring, inserting copy-and-pasted text in violation of copyrights, and used poor sources including circular ones ("books" that are themselves just Wikipedia mirrors) on the Georgian alphabet article, as well as engaged in repeated tendentious argument over it. If you continue editing in this vein, you will be blocked without further warning. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Երևանցի ^talk 21:37, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Secret ^account 01:03, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Medgeorgia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I blocked?! Where am I to argue, always bring sourcesMEDGEORGIA talk 08:25, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Kuru (talk) 15:10, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hint. Also read the stuff linked at the bottom of that essay. 79.255.213.251 (talk) 15:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Medgeorgia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have understood crime. I need Unblocking to ka.wikipedia work. MEDGEORGIA talk 17:42, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We can't do anything about ka-wiki. Your behavior here on en-wiki is why you are blocked here. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:07, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't understand you. You don't appear to be blocked at ka-wiki, and if you were, we couldn't do anything about it. Peridon (talk) 18:29, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected the mistakes in the English Wikipedia about Georgians and others, But I was involved into the discussion with Armenians.

I myself am fighting against injustice and insults. Please unblock me due to the contribution in ka wikipedia.--MEDGEORGIA talk 18:39, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, It seems you do not want to know the truth. It's good Continue to do so, write lies. It is a pity --MEDGEORGIA talk 19:18, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. You're asking us to take your good contributions at ka-wiki into account. Unfortunately, I don't think many of the en-wiki admins can read Kartvelian languages - or Armenian either... I can tell that you haven't been blocked from editing there, but nothing else. Peridon (talk) 19:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Bro. I was trying to defend my language from Armenians, but I was angry because of the insolence of Armenians. Therefore I Blocked. Not bad, I will continue work on Kartvelian language in Georgian (ka) wiki. --MEDGEORGIA talk 19:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Medgeorgia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Enough time has passed --MEDGEORGIA talk 21:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This was not a time-limited block. It was indefinite, in response to behavior by you. Indefinite blocks remain in place until the issue that led to them is resolved, so if you want to be unblocked, you will need to address the behavior you were blocked for, not just inform us that time has passed. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 22:13, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Medgeorgia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Enough time has passed

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. only (talk) 11:31, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Medgeorgia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Pls Unlock my block. It is difficult to work in such conditions. MEDGEORGIA talk 19:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

By now it should be clear to you that the Wikipedia community doesn't want your "work" here. If you make another unblock request without addressing the original issue, your talk page access will be indefinitely revoked as well. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:41, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am making a big contribution to KA Wikipedia, and already know how to write on wikipedia. block is no longer needed, because I understand why I was blocked, will not continue to cause damage or destruction, and I make a useful contribution instead. --MEDGEORGIA talk 10:44, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The last attempt

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Medgeorgia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am making a big contribution to KA Wikipedia and already know how to write on Wikipedia. Block is no longer needed, because I understand why I was blocked, will not continue to cause damage or destruction, and I make a useful contribution instead. MEDGEORGIA talk 16:43, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were warned above as to the consequences of this request. And nevertheless you continued. Now we will cast you into utter darkness and eternal hellfire ... Oh, do have a nice day. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:37, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 19:38, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]